2008 Brabus C-class

[JoeHemi57 0]

i know denim likes the MB stuff and this is quite nice looking for a c class.

http://www.leftlanenews.com/brabus-mercede....html#more-4914

[///M5 2,833]

Definitely nice for a C class.

[Bigpete123 1]

yep, a definite improvement. I'm not diggin the ghetto 80's grille and emblem though.

[Chevy350TPI 12]

I like it. Sleek.

http://www.leftlanenews.com/bmw-m3.html

[flakko 1]

I like it. Sleek.

http://www.leftlanenews.com/bmw-m3.html

ooh armenians are gonna have a hayday.

[///M5 2,833]

Sweet.

[Aaron Clinton 2,372]

Joe you are speaking my language!!

I want the C300 because it comes in a 6'er.

[Tirefryr 1,742]

The Brabus is pimp!

I have enjoyed the new-edge styling on the Bimmers as well, but this years models are not sitting too well with me. Last year's M3 was so damn hot, why change it? It's had subtle upgrades for however long, but now it's just overdone IMO.

[Aaron Clinton 2,372]

From what I was told, BMW had to make changes to fit the V8 at least. And I know they have wanted a V8 in that thing for a while. Not to mention to soften the Bangle design a little and get it closer to 911 performance.

[Tirefryr 1,742]

Why on earth did it need two more cylinders? They were very adept to modification and still be balanced very well. No need to throw more weight on the longer nose. I like the short front, V6.

[JoeHemi57 0]

Why on earth did it need two more cylinders? They were very adept to modification and still be balanced very well. No need to throw more weight on the longer nose. I like the short front, V6.

it was a straight 6, shouldn't have needed a longer nose for a V8.

i'm thinking about a BlueTec C class and throwing the kit/rims on it.

[Tirefryr 1,742]

You are correct. I don't know what I was thinking, but thanks!

[Aaron Clinton 2,372]

Why on earth did it need two more cylinders? They were very adept to modification and still be balanced very well. No need to throw more weight on the longer nose. I like the short front, V6.

it was a straight 6, shouldn't have needed a longer nose for a V8.

i'm thinking about a BlueTec C class and throwing the kit/rims on it.

[Aaron Clinton 2,372]

Why on earth did it need two more cylinders? They were very adept to modification and still be balanced very well. No need to throw more weight on the longer nose. I like the short front, V6.

I think part of it is because they are pushing power up market on all their lines, and with the 335i's TT I-6, I think a V8 in the M3 was the logicial step for them, because usually in comparison tests, the M3 was only lacking in forward thrust compared to its competitors with V8s.