Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
kj4jaq

ZCON 12D2 in 3 cubes @31Hz Enclosure, port question

Recommended Posts

Vehicle : 2010 Toyota Tundra DC
Location in the vehicle: back passenger side
Box size: W:22, H:19, D:17, using 3/4" = 3.0 cubes
Subwoofer make and model: SSA ZCON 12 D2
Subwoofer Size: 12"
Number of Subwoofers: 1
Type of Port: Aero Preferably (have a flared 3" aero already in my possession)
What type of music do you like?: DNB
Everyday listening
Tuning Freq (Hz): 31hz
Volume : 3.0

-------------------------------

So my question, is the 3" aeroport going to be large enough diameter for this sub?  I've read where people have used ports that were too small for the sub utilized, and didn't want to run into the same issue.  Any further suggestions or ideas for box and/or port(s) is welcome.  If you have further questions for me in regards to this, feel free to ask as well.   

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

One 3" aeroport does not have enough area.

 

What amp / power will you be using?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

RF 1500BDCP, and since it isn't enough area, i guess it will have to be a square port then

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

messing around and researching, i see where it says square port HxW ratio shouldnt be more than 1:8, what is the reasoning behind that? 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Those zcons like big boxes.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

understood about the big boxes, hence i wasnt going minimum volume requirement chose a happy medium at 3 cubes

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

understood about the big boxes, hence i wasnt going minimum volume requirement chose a happy medium at 3 cubes

That's what I was running mine at. Some people on the forum suggested bigger.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

i cannot go any larger then the box dimensions given in the first post..that is the largest i can go without taking seats out, and i am not willing to do that :(

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If you have more room, go even bigger on lower power

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If you have more room, go even bigger on lower power

Thats what I wanted to say.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What you suggested is 3.0 before port. Going to be a small box for the zcon

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

i could go up with height some, and possibly depth, but width is restricted to 22.5..unless i had a non-rectangular box, then that would add 13 x 6 box to the bottom

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

let me go back to the drawing board with this... thanks for everyones input.  it is much appreciated

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

messing around and researching, i see where it says square port HxW ratio shouldnt be more than 1:8, what is the reasoning behind that?

The above link shows no port height to width ratio, its port area vs port speed.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

eric is the 13x6 the area between the seat brackets?  Is that centered in the 22.5 you have for width?  I can start working something up, too...

 

Also- a depth top and depth bottom....a wedge will get you some needed volume.

 

Guys- would a sub forward/port up work well?  OR we could use the 13x6 area for port and extend it forward pointing under the pass seat...I have some ideas...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Whats your thoughts Bassink?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

eric is the 13x6 the area between the seat brackets?  Is that centered in the 22.5 you have for width?  I can start working something up, too...

 

Also- a depth top and depth bottom....a wedge will get you some needed volume.

 

Guys- would a sub forward/port up work well?  OR we could use the 13x6 area for port and extend it forward pointing under the pass seat...I have some ideas...

I used the port up in my jeep and liked it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

yeah the 13x6 area is between the seat brackets, i have to get back to my truck to verify that it is centered in the 22.5, still stuck offshore..unsure when i will get back in

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I am thinking along these lines...haven't done the math- just a general sketch.

 

post-40683-0-31596700-1379640556_thumb.j

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I was in a hurry when I made the last post...to be clear, that is to the dimensions 22wx19hx17d with the port being 13wx5.25h(for a net of 11.5x4.5, 52ci of port, ~17ci per ft^3)  The math I didn't work out was the port length needed.  Just wanted to know if the theory of the external port was solid first.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

messing around and researching, i see where it says square port HxW ratio shouldnt be more than 1:8, what is the reasoning behind that?

The above link shows no port height to width ratio, its port area vs port speed.

i was also googling stuff up, in addition to your link you provided.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Whats your thoughts Bassink?

 

 

I was thinking he would've been in here too...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Leedog, the seat rails are not spaced evenly side to side, from the left rail to the wall is 5.25", from the right rail to the wall is 3.25

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So that port would be running under the seat?

Did I miss what kind of vehicle?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

×