Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
onebadmonte

Fi Q10, Hornresp, D.A.T.S, vs. Me :)

Recommended Posts

The new box sounds great, I like it. biggrin.png I did hook up the ol' DATS to the box in vehicle and this is what I got:

 

incar_zps85ae5371.jpg

 

:/ From what I understand, an impedance curve like this represents a sealed box with a leak. Looks like I'm back to the drawing board looking for more port area to realize my theoretical 3dBs by going ported.

 

I'm bummed that  my Hornresp predicted impedance curve didn't match up to my DATS measured impedance curve. Anybody got any thoughts regarding that? On a side note the modeled tuning nearly match the measured tuning. :D

 

I did give the new box a run on the SPL Labs LCD Bass Meter. This is what I got:

40c36304-ada4-406d-af7b-5d7b2f348683_zps

 

Not bad for a single ten under 1000watts in a trunk car, but if there is more to be had, I want it. biggrin.png

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Because it is in a vehicle. You will always have losses that will affect Q. It's never gonna be the same.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Because it is in a vehicle. You will always have losses that will affect Q. It's never gonna be the same.

My first suggestion was going to be to pull it out of the car and remeasure.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Because it is in a vehicle. You will always have losses that will affect Q. It's never gonna be the same.

 

Is it maxed out or is there more to be had?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Because it is in a vehicle. You will always have losses that will affect Q. It's never gonna be the same.

My first suggestion was going to be to pull it out of the car and remeasure.

 

I did measure with the box on floor, with the woofer cone pointing up. The impedance curve was almost identical. This is what I got.

fiq10boxdatsinternalport2_zpsf90b0fd1.jp

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm curious as to why it is calculating Fo in the mid 50's

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm curious as to why it is calculating Fo in the mid 50's

 

My guess is the woofer is super stiff, the spiders still need breaking in. shrug.gif

 

I did run the DATS on the woofer before I got in a box. This is what I got. Note this was before the sub got any use, pretty much straight out of the box.

 

FIQ10PARALLEL_zps77856100.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So the Fo of the sub free air came out to be almost the same as in the box?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So the Fo of the sub free air came out to be almost the same as in the box?

 

Yes.

 

My apologies on that last graph, the ohm scale did not match the previously posted graph. :P

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

×