Welcome to the IHoP v.2

[dem beats 1,223]

Sports authority was closing out Asics gear.

 

I'm balls deep in smediums! Got a great waterproof shell, one cold weather, overshirt and a hot weather overshirt.

Those Nike pro shirts are awesome.  Longer than the underarmor style too and I love that.

 

Edited May 13, 2016 by dem beats

[Penguin4x4 1,761]

Silly monkeys, give them thumbs, they forge a blade

and where there's one they're bound to divide it
Right in two

[Billy Jack 145]

[sandt38 448]

2 hours ago, Billy Jack said:

This thread is awful new for you to be posting in.

 

[Billy Jack 145]

There always one in every crowd!!! 

[///M5 2,833]

11 hours ago, MKader17 said:

In all seriousness, if I'm taking a shot of a room, what's the best way to capture it with the light fixtures in the photo and not have them be beacons of over exposure 

Improve the overall light in the room.  Shitty lighting is shitty lighting.  If they are really beacons then you have to be careful underexposing the rest too much as you will lose dynamic range.  If you get the rest right and they are just a bit washed out it is easy to change the exposure of the lights themselves (and only them if you want) in lightroom.  Super easy in fact.  I regularly doctor light sources to improve the overall image.

[///M5 2,833]

Again something that is not possible in the instagram editing nonsense.  Picaso is killer in comparison....and picaso sucks

[///M5 2,833]

10 hours ago, dem beats said:

How do you get so many with good lighting?

:-D

Two words: Golden hour

[dem beats 1,223]

50 minutes ago, ///M5 said:

Two words: Golden shower

Perv

[MKader17 332]

1 hour ago, ///M5 said:

Again something that is not possible in the instagram editing nonsense.  Picaso is killer in comparison....and picaso sucks

Just for the record, I was messing with you guys.

So in light room do you basically just "circle" the lights and turn the exposure down on them?

How does this compare to doing white balance on raw files? or was your post assuming that this was a RAW edit?

[Billy Jack 145]

Mean while I'm over here lost like a old man with old timers in a nursing home.  This is the Viagra blog forum for old farts with limp noodles right??? Lol

Edited May 13, 2016 by Billy Jack
Misspelled a word

[MKader17 332]

So if I was to look at mirrorless, what should I look at and can I still buy used?

[///M5 2,833]

1 hour ago, MKader17 said:

Just for the record, I was messing with you guys.

So in light room do you basically just "circle" the lights and turn the exposure down on them?

How does this compare to doing white balance on raw files? or was your post assuming that this was a RAW edit?

It is a local white balance or exposure or whatever you need.  Tons of tools in lightroom to remove ANY blemishes.

[///M5 2,833]

57 minutes ago, Billy Jack said:

Mean while I'm over here lost like a old man with old timers in a nursing home.  This is the Viagra blog forum for old farts with limp noodles right??? Lol

Perhaps you should post while not looking in a mirror.

Alzheimer's is not spelled old timers, but I suppose when you have it you forget it.

[Billy Jack 145]

I know how it's spelled I was kidding and in Appalachia where I'm from they call it old timers instead of Alzheimer's. Kind of like up north they say soda and down south they say pop.

[///M5 2,833]

Why are you posting in such a new thread?  Thought you forgot they were new...

[Billy Jack 145]

wow, you guys are kind of hard on the new guys. Yes I have never commented on a forum in my life, so I made a mistake and didn't see the date, but no need to get ill about it. I was actually laughing at myself I thought it was funny that a old fart like me couldn't use technology imagine that but I'm figuring it out. 

[MKader17 332]

45 minutes ago, ///M5 said:

It is a local white balance or exposure or whatever you need.  Tons of tools in lightroom to remove ANY blemishes.

Lightroom is available on Android FYI. Not sure if it's anything like the desktop version.

[MKader17 332]

4 minutes ago, Billy Jack said:

wow, you guys are kind of hard on the new guys. Yes I have never commented on a forum in my life, so I made a mistake and didn't see the date, but no need to get ill about it. I was actually laughing at myself I thought it was funny that a old fart like me couldn't use technology imagine that but I'm figuring it out. 

Not to worry, we all are much harsher on the "old guys" (AKA each other) than the new guys.

[Penguin4x4 1,761]

 

[Penguin4x4 1,761]

 

[Aaron Clinton 2,372]

28 minutes ago, Penguin4x4 said:

 

 

 

[dem beats 1,223]

She is nice and squishy.

[Billy Jack 145]

Fuckin a papaw! 

[dem beats 1,223]

1 hour ago, Billy Jack said:

wow, you guys are kind of hard on the new guys. Yes I have never commented on a forum in my life, so I made a mistake and didn't see the date, but no need to get ill about it. I was actually laughing at myself I thought it was funny that a old fart like me couldn't use technology imagine that but I'm figuring it out. 

If this is tough, don't hang out for too long because once we really get to know someone we basically just try to make each other cry in every post.

:-D

Sensitive thugs, ya all need hugs.