Welcome to the IHoP v.2

[gprestonmoto 89]

Where's Sean? I don't know dickety doo da about cameras but I have an opportunity to trade for one. Looking for something worth 250-300. Is this a decent camera? http://www.amazon.com/camera-photo/dp/B00125MHVM

[dem beats 1,223]

Where's Sean? I don't know dickeo da about cameras but I have an opportunity to trade for one. Looking for something worth 250-300. Is this a decent camera? http://www.amazon.com/camera-photo/dp/B00125MHVM

That is a slim budget for an SLR. I will also make the blanket statement that Sony SLR is not money well spent. I know others love them. Of course they work. You just have less options long term. It instantly limits your options and ability to get a deal.

For that budget I might reccomend a point and shoot of nice quality from any brand. Any camera can take great pictures. The SLR just helps you, and allows you more freedom and helps you get better shots.

Edited July 21, 2013 by dem beats

[Julian 641]

Where's Sean? I don't know dickeo da about cameras but I have an opportunity to trade for one. Looking for something worth 250-300. Is this a decent camera? http://www.amazon.com/camera-photo/dp/B00125MHVM

That is a slim budget for an SLR. I will also make the blanket statement that Sony SLR is not money well spent. I know others love them. Of course they work. You just have less options long term. It instantly limits your options and ability to get a deal.

For that budget I might reccomend a point and shoot of nice quality from any brand. Any camera can take great pictures. The SLR just helps you, and allows you more freedom and helps you get better shots.

I'm looking to sell my Sony a55 for the right price if you would be interested.

[OuTLaWeD 110]

OLED Tv's? HELL YES!! oh wait, did you say $13,000? FUCK THAT

[ricksi30 923]

OLED Tv's? HELL YES!! oh wait, did you say $13,000? FUCK THAT

Hecto laser projection looks cool too. I will be waiting until they are affordable for once though. I have spent WAY too much money on tv's trying to get the "latest and greatest" when it first comes out, lesson learned.

[///M5 2,833]

Sony's make sense if you have legacy Konica Minolta glass

[nem 2,019]

 

Where's Sean? I don't know dickeo da about cameras but I have an opportunity to trade for one. Looking for something worth 250-300. Is this a decent camera? http://www.amazon.com/camera-photo/dp/B00125MHVM

That is a slim budget for an SLR. I will also make the blanket statement that Sony SLR is not money well spent. I know others love them. Of course they work. You just have less options long term. It instantly limits your options and ability to get a deal.

For that budget I might reccomend a point and shoot of nice quality from any brand. Any camera can take great pictures. The SLR just helps you, and allows you more freedom and helps you get better shots.

I'm looking to sell my Sony a55 for the right price if you would be interested.

 

Why are you selling?

[dem beats 1,223]

Sony's make sense if you have legacy Konica Minolta glass

English only. No dead languages allowed.

[dem beats 1,223]

Where's Sean? I don't know dickeo da about cameras but I have an opportunity to trade for one. Looking for something worth 250-300. Is this a decent camera? http://www.amazon.com/camera-photo/dp/B00125MHVM

That is a slim budget for an SLR. I will also make the blanket statement that Sony SLR is not money well spent. I know others love them. Of course they work. You just have less options long term. It instantly limits your options and ability to get a deal.

For that budget I might reccomend a point and shoot of nice quality from any brand. Any camera can take great pictures. The SLR just helps you, and allows you more freedom and helps you get better shots.

I'm looking to sell my Sony a55 for the right price if you would be interested.

Why are you selling?

He knows he chose poorly.

[nem 2,019]

 

 

 

Where's Sean? I don't know dickeo da about cameras but I have an opportunity to trade for one. Looking for something worth 250-300. Is this a decent camera? http://www.amazon.com/camera-photo/dp/B00125MHVM

That is a slim budget for an SLR. I will also make the blanket statement that Sony SLR is not money well spent. I know others love them. Of course they work. You just have less options long term. It instantly limits your options and ability to get a deal.

For that budget I might reccomend a point and shoot of nice quality from any brand. Any camera can take great pictures. The SLR just helps you, and allows you more freedom and helps you get better shots.

I'm looking to sell my Sony a55 for the right price if you would be interested.

Why are you selling?

He knows he chose poorly.

 

Why would that be?

[dem beats 1,223]

I am a snob.

Nothing more. They have some cool gimmicks, but the lack of support and lens options is huge.

[///M5 2,833]

Sony's make sense if you have legacy Konica Minolta glass

English only. No dead languages allowed.

Sony's are Konica's. They bought into the market instead of developing it. Old Konica lenses fit and work on Sony salt cameras

[nem 2,019]

I am alway curious of one's thoughts. Nothing else.

[dem beats 1,223]

Do those old lenses have AF?

I didn't know they shared a mount with anyone.... I never heard of that brand either however.

[dem beats 1,223]

I am alway curious of one's thoughts. Nothing else.

I am kind of joking. The manager at my store has a Sony, and he loves it. Makes great pics. I just don't see them as having as much support. I didn't know they had some legacy lenses.

[nem 2,019]

My question is; Is there an atvantage to using a UV filter on a DSLR? I am thinking of getting one before I head to the islands to reduce glare.

[nem 2,019]

B&H says it is a good idea. What are your thoughts or is it a no brainer and just pick one up?

[dem beats 1,223]

They are good for stopping your lens from getting damaged. That is it. DSLR sensors are not sensitive to UV light. A hood would do more for glare.

[nem 2,019]

They are good for stopping your lens from getting damaged. That is it. DSLR sensors are not sensitive to UV light. A hood would do more for glare.

I have to pick up a smaller hood as I only have a longer one for my zoom lens. The hood is on the list.

 

No need to get the filter thn.

[///M5 2,833]

Do those old lenses have AF?

I didn't know they shared a mount with anyone.... I never heard of that brand either however.

Konica is a HUGE glass manufacturer.

[///M5 2,833]

My question is; Is there an atvantage to using a UV filter on a DSLR? I am thinking of getting one before I head to the islands to reduce glare.

for that a circular polarizer is king

[///M5 2,833]

They are good for stopping your lens from getting damaged. That is it. DSLR sensors are not sensitive to UV light. A hood would do more for glare.

I have to pick up a smaller hood as I only have a longer one for my zoom lens. The hood is on the list.

 

No need to get the filter thn.

small hoods don't work. I shattered a uh filter when my camera fell off a table. Saved the lens. UUv's only purpose however

[///M5 2,833]

Sitting on a plane. I hate traveling on Sunday.

[///M5 2,833]

Will be pretty much away from the forum for a couple weeks

[dem beats 1,223]

I learn more every day here.