SMD Forum is well...

[Godsmack 361]

So your are suggesting it could become another ca.com eh?

J

[ford302redneck 15]

Good on ya for being honest. I havent been on SMD in ages, and no real need to be either. I had an issue over there, that I felt was not properly handeled, but so be it. Whats done is done.

J

I just believe in fairness.

If the moderation staff had such a problem with me, a PM should of took place, explaining what I was doing was becoming a problem. Which I would kind of argued about. But some of my post was a tad of the prick side, I admit. But for the most part, they wasn't that bad. And after the PM, if I didn't change the problem, then I would be banned for a length of time.

Which mods did quote my post and say stuff, but never a warning. The users said I would get banned, I just didn't see people I just made look like idiots, have any real authority to warn me.

Permanent ban seems harsh over nothing. That's what I don't think is fair. Which basically what I think it boils down to, I brought up DAT failed, and David don't want nobody to remind anybody he failed.

Oh well. Seriously enough ranting. I'm blogging it seems now.

[ford302redneck 15]

So your are suggesting it could become another ca.com eh?

J

Its possible, but minus people bashing, because they don't know enough to.

I learned to how deal with forum people because on CA.com. Back in 06-07 I loved ca.com. Had good drama, funny threads, and yet still good info. And if you made a dumb post 100 people jumped in and tore you apart. Which inturn makes you realize not to just post anything. Actually have facts behind your post. And it gives you tough skin against criticism. Which is what SMD needs BAD.

80% of those members would kill their selves if they was on ca.com back then.

Heck some would even kill their selves on this site because nobody here let's people post bullshit without proving them wrong. Which is a good thing, unless you have a hard time dealing with people proving you wrong and then cry. Still, nobody should give out way wrong info. Its just bad all the way around.

[Kanaworm$ 292]

*Round of Applause*

I personally don't care about any of this, I'm just here to bump up my post count so people respect me more

[Bob345 39]

:facepalm:

[kirill007 52]

Good on ya for being honest. I havent been on SMD in ages, and no real need to be either. I had an issue over there, that I felt was not properly handeled, but so be it. Whats done is done.

J

I just believe in fairness.

If the moderation staff had such a problem with me, a PM should of took place, explaining what I was doing was becoming a problem. Which I would kind of argued about. But some of my post was a tad of the prick side, I admit. But for the most part, they wasn't that bad. And after the PM, if I didn't change the problem, then I would be banned for a length of time.

Which mods did quote my post and say stuff, but never a warning. The users said I would get banned, I just didn't see people I just made look like idiots, have any real authority to warn me.

Permanent ban seems harsh over nothing. That's what I don't think is fair. Which basically what I think it boils down to, I brought up **** failed, and David don't want nobody to remind anybody he failed.

Oh well. Seriously enough ranting. I'm blogging it seems now.

You did got a warning, atleast one, from candyman i think that's his name, i even quoted him on this thread.

You say other people are getting butthurt, but what is this thread all about then? (you being butthurt and spreading misinformation out of only you're point of view? )

[Randal Johnson 544]

[Sir-Lancelot 216]

Too much selling behind the scenes over there for my taste.

Nut Hugging gone wild, IMO.

[Loud n Clean 1]

I'm a member on SMD too and seen tons of your posts and i'm glad you got banned cause you were a straight up prick most of the time.

[Tirefryr 1,742]

Here's the deal. . . Leave the other forum bullshit at the other forums.