final system layout

[dave_Edwards 1]

ok here is what I have planned

Alpine Type X SPX 177a tweets

RE 6.5 midbass/midrange----both fully active from the P9 combo ran off of the MS1000TA (340x4)

the Brahma 15(3.0 cubes sealed) 1 ohm off the Revolution 1500.1(1580x1 @1 ohm)

alittle under 3K watts of SQ

what do ya think?

[Supa_c 1]

I think its gonna be LOUD

[dave_Edwards 1]

and hopefully sound great doing it.

[finebar4 0]

Do you already have the tweets? I just ordered a set of the SPX-177T's this morning. I got them at $60 a tweet. Gonna match them with some Seas Lotus I have sitting here.....but yes your amp is bigger than mine. Lemme know if you want the place I ordered from this morning.

[dave_Edwards 1]

I already have the tweets----but others here might want the link.

[Supa_c 1]

and hopefully sound great doing it.

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

Of course.

Its easy to get loud and sound like pooh

[dave_Edwards 1]

so you think I will have enough headroom?

[Supa_c 1]

Plenty

[finebar4 0]

I think the sheer dynamics of what you have in the works is going to be killer. At 300+ per driver, transients will NEVER be an issue. I did do a post in the component section for the scanspeaks in alpine clothing, if anyone is interested, but man Dave, I would sure love to hear yours when it is up and running. I have 4 of the Seas Lotus, I am debating 250 watts each or dropping 2 and keeping it somewhat simple, and just doing a 2 way. I have a 3-way passive set-up at the moment that was a real female dog to get tuned, but now that it is....I gotta admit loving that dedicated mid in their. I am dying to get the Lotus in there, but took a while to decide on the tweet. Looks like I did good......makes feel a lot more secure in my choice to see you are running the metal dome version.

[Acidburn 10]

as req would say, SQ with balls

[Supa_c 1]

radioactive ones

[Aaron Clinton 2,372]

Dave I am confused, what equipment is new?

[Tirefryr 1,742]

I, PERSONALLY would use a different 6.5, but that's just me. Looks lovely to me though!

[dave_Edwards 1]

the only thing new is the P9----I am going to running active---so I can have 1 channel per speaker up front(the most useful way to get everything out of the P9 combo)-----I am still up in the air on which size resistor to use inline with the tweeters(for protection) 340 watts RMS is WAY too much for them----got to protect them.

PS----what 6.5 would you use?

[Tirefryr 1,742]

the only thing new is the P9----I am going to running active---so I can have 1 channel per speaker up front(the most useful way to get everything out of the P9 combo)-----I am still up in the air on which size resistor to use inline with the tweeters(for protection) 340 watts RMS is WAY too much for them----got to protect them.

PS----what 6.5 would you use?

I, PSERSONALLY, would use the Seas Lotus, but that's just me.