Welcome to the IHoP

[bassahaulic 155]

"10" is binary for the number "1"

[///M5 2,833]

drank got me movin slower than a retard

if the shoe fits, err, if the drink goes down....whatever

[///M5 2,833]

Isn't FI kind of impossible in a 2 stroke with the exhaust valve and intake valve being open at the same time?

What?? Then how would a carb work? If you can do it with a carb you can do it with FI and better.

[///M5 2,833]

I don't care if you have a PhD and are a professor, its obvious that you don't know how things actually work...

There is a reason for that acronym. Push here Dummy.

[NB50 206]

"10" is binary for the number "2"

Fixed

[///M5 2,833]

"10" is binary for the number "1"

fail

[bassahaulic 155]

"10" is binary for the number "2"

Fixed

Thanks!!!!! lol

As soon as someone pointed it out I realized i messed up typing.

[///M5 2,833]

Just some nice coax off deck power is planned.

I thought you said you were going to make it sound good?

He wants to keep it looking stock

Easy to do without using the oxymoron you state as headunit power. Never a good idea.

[///M5 2,833]

What is that tuned to, Bromo? Would having two ports that are different lengths have any effect on the sound?

It is an ABC(aperiodic bi-chamber) box, you may not be able to see it well but there is a chamber between the port on the back wall and the port on the left side.

I see it now. What are the benefits of this type of enclosure? Flatter response? What is it tuned to?

From my research you get a wider range of efficiency over a regular ported enclosure, more cone control over the range. The chamber that houses the driver is 31hz while the small chamber next to it is 72hz both chambers combined is 40.5hz. The down side of them they are huge, weigh a ton, and are more difficult to build. I built one before that should work for my Flatlyne, this one is a little more in depth though. I need to get a mic so I can see what they are really doing.

Here is the one I built before.

Keep drinking "that" kool-aid if you think your installation in a vehicle is going to be the same as your plan.

[Duran 387]

Just some nice coax off deck power is planned.

I thought you said you were going to make it sound good?

He wants to keep it looking stock

Easy to do without using the oxymoron you state as headunit power. Never a good idea.

I realize that Sean, but it's what the customer wants.

[Duran 387]

Top, and 3000th post

[patented17 21]

I hate the late nights, can't sleep so I guess I'll post nights.

[NB50 206]

What is that tuned to, Bromo? Would having two ports that are different lengths have any effect on the sound?

It is an ABC(aperiodic bi-chamber) box, you may not be able to see it well but there is a chamber between the port on the back wall and the port on the left side.

I see it now. What are the benefits of this type of enclosure? Flatter response? What is it tuned to?

From my research you get a wider range of efficiency over a regular ported enclosure, more cone control over the range. The chamber that houses the driver is 31hz while the small chamber next to it is 72hz both chambers combined is 40.5hz. The down side of them they are huge, weigh a ton, and are more difficult to build. I built one before that should work for my Flatlyne, this one is a little more in depth though. I need to get a mic so I can see what they are really doing.

Here is the one I built before.

Keep drinking "that" kool-aid if you think your installation in a vehicle is going to be the same as your plan.

What kool-aid? There is no references to kool-aid any where? And I know things change when put in a vehicle, there is also ways to predict what will happen. As stated before I would like to get a mic to see what gain is happening in the car,and apply it to the predicted model to get a better plan.

[///M5 2,833]

From my research you get a wider range of efficiency over a regular ported enclosure, more cone control over the range.

What kool-aid?

Figure of speech, but in reference to believing that your "research" will equate to reality in the car.

[seanbw 1]

UGV pics from last week

.....................

That really looks awesome mang!

IT'S ALIVE!!!

[seanbw 1]

There is tech out there also where when you apply the brakes of a vehicle it uses a roller to store energy, be it compressed air or otherwise, and then when you take off you can engage the stored energy to take less stress off the engine. I would think a hundred PSI from a stop or 2 could really help you off the line.

Probably more work than it's worth and might weigh you down so it would hurt performance when just running on the engine... Worth looking into.

I know I would be impressed if you did it!

i may be mistaken but didn't ford make a fullsize truck with this technology already that gets obscene gas mileage however it is not in production because they're fucktards?

[NB50 206]

From my research you get a wider range of efficiency over a regular ported enclosure, more cone control over the range.

What kool-aid?

Figure of speech, but in reference to believing that your "research" will equate to reality in the car.

So then you have experience with these enclosures in a vehicle?

[Duran 387]

i may be mistaken but didn't ford make a fullsize truck with this technology already that gets obscene gas mileage however it is not in production because they're fucktards?

That's my damn word!

[Duran 387]

i may be mistaken but didn't ford make a fullsize truck with this technology already that gets obscene gas mileage however it is not in production because they're fucktards?

That's my damn word!

[Duran 387]

Double post FTL!

[Duran 387]

That was one big juicy fail

Not as juicy as this thing though, the famous Big Jud!

[topgun 262]

I don't care if you have a PhD and are a professor, its obvious that you don't know how things actually work...

There is a reason for that acronym. Push here Dummy.

Haven't heard that one before, but I do like that.

Those who can, do.

Those who can't, teach.

Those who can't do either, administrate.

[topgun 262]

What kool-aid? There is no references to kool-aid any where? And I know things change when put in a vehicle, there is also ways to predict what will happen. As stated before I would like to get a mic to see what gain is happening in the car,and apply it to the predicted model to get a better plan.

Curious as to what you are using to actually model that correctly.

[topgun 262]

There is tech out there also where when you apply the brakes of a vehicle it uses a roller to store energy, be it compressed air or otherwise, and then when you take off you can engage the stored energy to take less stress off the engine. I would think a hundred PSI from a stop or 2 could really help you off the line.

Probably more work than it's worth and might weigh you down so it would hurt performance when just running on the engine... Worth looking into.

I know I would be impressed if you did it!

i may be mistaken but didn't ford make a fullsize truck with this technology already that gets obscene gas mileage however it is not in production because they're fucktards?

Sure, and Joe Blow built a 100mpg carburetor in his garage too....

[///M5 2,833]

From my research you get a wider range of efficiency over a regular ported enclosure, more cone control over the range.

What kool-aid?

Figure of speech, but in reference to believing that your "research" will equate to reality in the car.

So then you have experience with these enclosures in a vehicle?

Nope, don't need any.

Professional engineers can't make a model that matches reality and you expect to? If not, I might not have a job.