///M5

And by reach Carver Titanium O-Beast 19.2 Foes Mutz 18.75 Salsa Bucksaw 18.7 Surly Wednesday 18.5 Maxx Huraxdax 18.5 Surly Ice Cream Truck 18.4 Carver Titanium O-Beast 18.13 Carver Titanium O-Beast 18.01 Specialized Fatboy Trail 18 Specialized Fatboy 18 Ventana El Gordo 18 Scott Big Ed 17.9 Maxx Jagamoasta 17.9 Trek Farley 9.6 17.87 Cannondale Fat CAAD 1 17.8 Salsa Blackborow 17.7 Surly Moonlander 17.7 Salsa Mukluk 17.6 Reeb Donkadonk & TiDonk 17.6 Borealis Echo (also carbon version available) 17.52 Salsa Beargrease 17.5 Trek Farley 9 17.48 Lamere 170mm - FRAME only 17.47 Lamere 190mm - FRAME only 17.32 Dengfu FM190 17.32 KHS 4 Season 3000 17.3 Ican SN01 17.21 Carbon Cycle Carbon Cycle 17.185 Surly Pugsley 16.7

That was sorted by head tube angle. Here is chainstay length Surly Wednesday 17.1 Salsa Beargrease 17.3 Salsa Blackborow 17.3 Trek Farley 9 17.32 Trek Farley 9.6 17.32 Carbon Cycle Carbon Cycle 17.322835 Salsa Bucksaw 17.5 Ican SN01 17.5 Surly Pugsley 17.6 Peter CS-001-21 17.7 Surly Ice Cream Truck 17.7 Scott Big Ed 17.7 Surly Moonlander 17.7 Foes Mutz 17.9 Lynskey Fatskey 17.9 Specialized Fatboy Trail 17.9 Specialized Fatboy 17.9 Cannondale Fat CAAD 1 18 Maxx Huraxdax 18.1 Borealis Echo (also carbon version available) 18.11 Salsa Mukluk 18.3 Reeb Donkadonk & TiDonk 18.3 Peter N019 18.3 Lamere 170mm - FRAME only 18.38 Lamere 190mm - FRAME only 18.42 Dengfu FM190 18.42 KHS 4 Season 3000 18.7 Maxx Jagamoasta 18.7 Carver Carbo Beast ? Carver Titanium O-Beast 17.3-18.1 Carver Titanium O-Beast 17.3-18.1 Carver Titanium O-Beast 17.3-18.1 Ventana El Gordo 17.3-18.3

Matt you indirectly asked in a text, this is the spreadsheet I showed early lol In order of slackness Foes Mutz 67 Trek Farley 9 68 Peter CS-001-21 68 Surly Ice Cream Truck 68 Salsa Bucksaw 68 KHS 4 Season 3000 68.5 Salsa Beargrease 68.5 Salsa Mukluk 68.5 Ican SN01 68.5 Ventana El Gordo 69 Cannondale Fat CAAD 1 69 Scott Big Ed 69 Reeb Donkadonk & TiDonk 69 Trek Farley 9.6 69 Surly Wednesday 69 Maxx Jagamoasta 69.5 Maxx Huraxdax 69.5 Carbon Cycle Carbon Cycle 69.5 Salsa Blackborow 69.5 Peter N019 69.7 Carver Titanium O-Beast 70 Carver Titanium O-Beast 70 Carver Titanium O-Beast 70 Lynskey Fatskey 70 Lamere 190mm - FRAME only 70.5 Dengfu FM190 70.5 Lamere 170mm - FRAME only 70.5 Surly Moonlander 70.5 Specialized Fatboy Trail 70.5 Specialized Fatboy 70.5 Surly Pugsley 70.5

You can't just have a 50mm although if you did you would bever uae the kit lens again

That is actually better rhan what i saw but still dumb pucking retatded

If that was bling the word is now dead

Or 5 or 4

Should grab 6 couples and do it.

It was on tv. Clicked across looking for hockey and had to leave it to laugh for a minute. So bad. He didn't even rap, just spoke and waved his arms around like a parapalegic.

Short bus is an understatement. Dumb pucker dances like he is a permanent fixture of the short bus situation. No talent whatsoever at all. Seriously the worst garbage I've ever seen attempted to be labeled music.

Then start to pixel peep and look at your focus. Sharpness in the camera is one things, but you will over resolve your lenses which is self defeating.

Play with it on some of your shots. Hold the ALT and adjust the white balance until you see only a couple dots of washed out white. Now do the same for the blacks. Look at the pic, then wash out a bit more of the blacks and look again. I'd bet you'll find you like the blacks turned up.

That being said, high DR isn't really what you need but it well chosen. I never use the full DR when I shoot landscapes as I purposely like to shade the darks. You'll notice other folks who work on landscapes do the same. Pretty much nearly any good camera has enough DR to make those work, but regularly you get smacked because your lens bites.

ah, don't use auto in the camera then I don't even see why the software offers it. There is no way that ANY software can make the dynamic range look as good as you can.

Just saw possibly the worst bit of music ever. Some dipshit named Drake. How the fuck ain't he broke? Seriously retarded.

Prioritizing on the thing that makes the biggest difference is the goal. The days of that being the body are well more than 5 years old.

Sharpness is pointless on your body. You are hardcore lens limited. Even on my "shitty" 70d the lens dominates like crazy enough so that you can pretty much neglect even thinking about the body. Hell that holds true for my old Xsi as well. The AF is monstrous. #1 cause of bad pictures is being out of focus. Includes landscapes (also my primary targets). Sure we would all like more dynamic range and atm Nikon has an advantage there, but lenses will outlast many bodies and that is a somewhat trivial spec to buy a camera on. In particular when the lenses cost more for the same thing so you have to step down from prosumer to consumer to afford the package.

What auto correct settings? Didn't know there was such a thing. Steps to correct photos Profile Correction, Highlights, Shadows, Whites and Blacks. For your lenses you will NEED to also correct for the chromatic aberration as everything you've posted with any light is halo'd like hell atm

Somehow that sounds more like a few days than an afternoon. Camelbacking bourbon, rofl. Mmm, warm bourbon through a straw!

I am enamored with my 50mm prime and not my zoom leading me to want the 135f2 I realize that the flexibility is huge, I am just afraid that I will really want the F2 instead after

Aidan's game is at 5:45 if it isn't raining. Sort of the perfect environment for me to test the 70-200 on my crop. Need to figure out how to combine a bike shop stop with some picture taking.....and drinks, lol

The choices are non-IS or IS II, IS I is a waste. Downgrade compared to non-IS optically, but II cured that

Ah, only "f"ucking not fuck. Funny

Interesting pucking. Thought I'd see puck

fuck shit