///M5

The Chevelle isn't my style at all, but it sure does show off what their chassis can do to the stance of the car. I will post more pics when I return on Sunday.

Also met Phil, they make quite a chassis as well, not bad for a little local shop.

Had a nice long talk with Jeff Schwartz. He drove from Chicago, funny to see bug marks on his car

Might have to make it up for a weekend, especially if there is smallie fishing on Sat.

Oh I'd love to live there...and people say our climate is bad?? That is death. Oh, kidding on the camera comment.

take pics stupid camera didn't work

Gotta shower and get to the fair grounds

I didn't even read the spec, just a generic response. As for the probes you really only need two unless you want to measure current (which it may or may not do) and then you would need a current transformer (CT).

Now whether a cheap piece of gear is reliable and will last is another story. Who knows on that. If someone has had one for a while they could pipe in.

They may only be 5% accurate instead of .1%, but for your purpose you really just need to see the waveform shape. The time clock may not be the ultimate in accuracy either, but again it will be relatively correct which is more than adequate for your needs. It isn't like you care if it reads 41hz instead of 40hz (when counting the time window). In other words, I wouldn't worry about the accuracy. If it were a 10% device it would be fine. For your app, you really only need to see clipping and the waveform and neither matter that much on overall accuracy.

You have a space problem, those w6's are nice. A different box would really wake them up. With the extra power a pair of Q's would make sense though.

The only possible "general" answer to that question is all the way down, otherwise there is no general. Having your gains set as low as possible is a great thing.

tOp

I bought a real old school one at a Toro auction for $15, got a nice drafting table too. This was before ebay and craigslist so I am not sure how business's get rid of stuff now, but they used to just have little sales. I did cheat and had an employee buy it for me as there wasn't public availability.

Morning Adrian & Ramos!

surprisingly, not that many of us actually drive V8-powered, RWD cars anymore Nope but there are a chit ton of RWD V8 trucks.

If you had an H701 and 2 belle's you should be in the 3 way world. Bridged belle for midbass and the other 4 chn for midrange and tweet. Then you need to up the 7" driver a notch, even though I LOVE the Nextels.

A hole is MUCH better than a peak. Either way I'd try and roll down the freq's next to it even if it means higher levels on the gains to compensate. Boosting with an eq has never given me results that I am very happy with (other than minor boost of course)

Yummy!!!

In the replacement for the M there will either be a screen and an H701 or a screen/car pc. Probably the latter as I will NEVER put a dvd in my car, but want a touch screen for controls. Wouldn't suck to have internet in the car as well.

What was Mike trying to tell us?

God I am jealous already

ToP

If you want, buy a H701 combo and I'll trade you my 880 and 8454 for it.

It is a lowly graphic. The only bummer to me at all with that deck is that it doesn't include a simple parametric as well. If it added a three band para and kept the huge graphic it would be completely killer. Either way there are enough bands to do what you need to do. I really have nothing but good things to say about the 880.