Acidburn

better watch out, Jim is handsy... Pfft, you wish... I know

omghi2u!!1

my Dad has a laptop from the 80's that uses a floppy disk as its hard drive

That place looks great

better watch out, Jim is handsy...

LOLOLOL I remember the Turbo button

x2

don't you have to be 40 to be Pres? IIRC 35, so I didn't make the cut this year. And HEY ASSHOLE, I won't be 40 in 4 years. I know you're not that old, that's why I was confused. But yeah, it is 35 for Pres., 30 for Senate

thanks for filling me in and still didn't catch ur name mine is travis by the way he's Scott

/\ TOP

Your a day late. not really just getting the train rolling for 2012! If I have to run with Palin, she has to be naked. **votes for Sean**

don't you have to be 40 to be Pres?

Are you actually going to swap to larger brakes any time soon?

I thought that was a given since he was running as a Democrat Party affiliation isn't what it used to be. The stereotypes for the two big parties don't always apply. But the Democrats knew what they were doing. Put in a black man and say he'll change everything from what Bush is doing. That's all he would have had to say. He'd get 15% of the vote just from that from all the ignorant people who knew nothing about either candidate but still had to make sure to vote, plus the 45% that the Democratic party would have gotten anyway. I think the "just go vote" mentality that all the national groups, celebrities, sports stars, etc. are telling people is misguiding. They need to change it to "Go learn about the candidates so that your vote is not in ignorance." Too many people these days vote solely on how charismatic a candidate is. Politics are about POLICIES, not smooth talking you at a cocktail party. I think that the 200+ year old terms, democrat and republican, need to be rethought. FYI, the "Republican" party had only been around for ~140 years. but yes, they are getting quite stale. Southern slave owners were only around 140 years ago? Are you sure about that You do know that the slave owners were by and large Democrats, the Republicans were the young, upstart radicals from the North led by a certain tall, skinny, crazy person from Illinois

nice!

yep, AZISSO and ISSF, you? I'm guessing you have a Caprice wagon on wire wheels?

omghi2u!!1

I thought that was a given since he was running as a Democrat Party affiliation isn't what it used to be. The stereotypes for the two big parties don't always apply. But the Democrats knew what they were doing. Put in a black man and say he'll change everything from what Bush is doing. That's all he would have had to say. He'd get 15% of the vote just from that from all the ignorant people who knew nothing about either candidate but still had to make sure to vote, plus the 45% that the Democratic party would have gotten anyway. I think the "just go vote" mentality that all the national groups, celebrities, sports stars, etc. are telling people is misguiding. They need to change it to "Go learn about the candidates so that your vote is not in ignorance." Too many people these days vote solely on how charismatic a candidate is. Politics are about POLICIES, not smooth talking you at a cocktail party. That is one of the truest things I've ever read. Agreed. Although, I would like to make an addition. "Politics are about POLICIES, not smooth talking you at a cocktail party or scaring you into obedience."

don't say a word, it's not on here for another couple hours

I thought that was a given since he was running as a Democrat Party affiliation isn't what it used to be. The stereotypes for the two big parties don't always apply. But the Democrats knew what they were doing. Put in a black man and say he'll change everything from what Bush is doing. That's all he would have had to say. He'd get 15% of the vote just from that from all the ignorant people who knew nothing about either candidate but still had to make sure to vote, plus the 45% that the Democratic party would have gotten anyway. I think the "just go vote" mentality that all the national groups, celebrities, sports stars, etc. are telling people is misguiding. They need to change it to "Go learn about the candidates so that your vote is not in ignorance." Too many people these days vote solely on how charismatic a candidate is. Politics are about POLICIES, not smooth talking you at a cocktail party. I think that the 200+ year old terms, democrat and republican, need to be rethought. FYI, the "Republican" party had only been around for ~140 years. but yes, they are getting quite stale.

omghi2u!!1

my Degree Audit Report is almost all green... scarrryyy

I thought that was a given since he was running as a Democrat Party affiliation isn't what it used to be. The stereotypes for the two big parties don't always apply. But the Democrats knew what they were doing. Put in a black man and say he'll change everything from what Bush is doing. That's all he would have had to say. He'd get 15% of the vote just from that from all the ignorant people who knew nothing about either candidate but still had to make sure to vote, plus the 45% that the Democratic party would have gotten anyway. I think the "just go vote" mentality that all the national groups, celebrities, sports stars, etc. are telling people is misguiding. They need to change it to "Go learn about the candidates so that your vote is not in ignorance." Too many people these days vote solely on how charismatic a candidate is. Politics are about POLICIES, not smooth talking you at a cocktail party. That is one of the truest things I've ever read.

so are El Caminos/Caballeros/Rancheros cars or trucks?

omghi2u!!1