Acidburn

omghi2u!!1

that's going to go for a pretty penny

the other direction is "smoketrees," i think i'll go thataway! Down the road from Marlboro Drive and Columbine Drive http://maps.google.com/maps?q=Smoketree+Av...003487&z=19 lol, Lake Havasu is a special place

NICE!

omghi2u!!1

omghi2u!!1

omghi2u!!1

wanted to put this on top Quality idea. As far as I know, we are having a discussion. Anyone is free to join.

While I agree there is a difference, it's not great enough to warrant the deletion of one kind and not the other. Why's it a big deal if someone else recommends another site though? If you were truly confident in the quality of this site, you'd have no worries. Nothing was deleted, only one post was moved to a place where it could be discussed. I have no worries on the quality of the site, that is and has never been in question, what was is the intent of a user to purposely try to make members leave with them. In addition, there is no issue with suggesting another site when the other site has information needed that is not supplied on the current forum, or has features not available, etc. Deleted and moved to a "Topics under review" section are basically the same thing. Both remove the post from the public's eye. Who said anyone was trying to make people leave this site? It's not as though a person can't be members of two forums. And other places can offer things that SSA currently does not. The intent was clear, and the last sentence of my prior post answers your last two sentences quite well. So you say "there is no issue with suggesting another site when the other site has information needed that is not supplied on the current forum, or has features not available, etc." answers "It's not as though a person can't be members of two forums. And other places can offer things that SSA currently does not." So why delete the post? And the intent was not clear that he was telling people to leave here, that was an (incorrect) assumption on your part. Again, the post was only moved and can always be moved back, and it was not in reference to something SSA does not offer. So yes it answers the questions, as I said; there is no issue ^^^ And with recent mentality, prior threatening to leave, leaving for a while, only to return with a poor attitude, the intent was very clear (which was further backed up by facebook messages, and the childish reaction afterwards to the moved post). Which still leaves my action to move the post correct. Saying it can be moved back means nothing, it was removed. Actually, it was in reference to something SSA does not currently offer. That intent was only clear to someone looking for that intent. And in regards to Facebook, Jim sent NO message to either me nor Ryan2. We were the ones that left the initial wall posts, and NONE of Jim's responses were telling us to leave SSA. Tom, I am flat sick of discussing this with you. You are trying to make a point that is not there with generalizations that do not work. I have and had no reason to go looking for intent, I explained it to you pretty damn clearly. And now you are telling me SSA does not offer a place for pictures. Wow, this is not worth another post, you are only going to believe what you want to believe. I am so beyond tired of the drama, not discussing this any further, not worth my time. So now we can't have an intelligent discussion about the state of this forum? I have my beliefs, which I know are different from yours, but I can see where you're coming from. All I've been trying to do is get you to see this from another perspective which would allow you to understand the issues people have been having with this site. Instead of simply leaving, this is my attempt to better the forum. Who said anything about pictures? What SSA currently does not offer is a tight-knit group of responsible, intelligent enthusiasts with an admin(s) who shares the same goal.

While I agree there is a difference, it's not great enough to warrant the deletion of one kind and not the other. Why's it a big deal if someone else recommends another site though? If you were truly confident in the quality of this site, you'd have no worries. Nothing was deleted, only one post was moved to a place where it could be discussed. I have no worries on the quality of the site, that is and has never been in question, what was is the intent of a user to purposely try to make members leave with them. In addition, there is no issue with suggesting another site when the other site has information needed that is not supplied on the current forum, or has features not available, etc. Deleted and moved to a "Topics under review" section are basically the same thing. Both remove the post from the public's eye. Who said anyone was trying to make people leave this site? It's not as though a person can't be members of two forums. And other places can offer things that SSA currently does not. The intent was clear, and the last sentence of my prior post answers your last two sentences quite well. So you say "there is no issue with suggesting another site when the other site has information needed that is not supplied on the current forum, or has features not available, etc." answers "It's not as though a person can't be members of two forums. And other places can offer things that SSA currently does not." So why delete the post? And the intent was not clear that he was telling people to leave here, that was an (incorrect) assumption on your part. Again, the post was only moved and can always be moved back, and it was not in reference to something SSA does not offer. So yes it answers the questions, as I said; there is no issue ^^^ And with recent mentality, prior threatening to leave, leaving for a while, only to return with a poor attitude, the intent was very clear (which was further backed up by facebook messages, and the childish reaction afterwards to the moved post). Which still leaves my action to move the post correct. Saying it can be moved back means nothing, it was removed. Actually, it was in reference to something SSA does not currently offer. That intent was only clear to someone looking for that intent. And in regards to Facebook, Jim sent NO message to either me nor Ryan2. We were the ones that left the initial wall posts, and NONE of Jim's responses were telling us to leave SSA.

hydraulic system? shop compressed air supply? pipes in a house would even qualify

While I agree there is a difference, it's not great enough to warrant the deletion of one kind and not the other. Why's it a big deal if someone else recommends another site though? If you were truly confident in the quality of this site, you'd have no worries. Nothing was deleted, only one post was moved to a place where it could be discussed. I have no worries on the quality of the site, that is and has never been in question, what was is the intent of a user to purposely try to make members leave with them. In addition, there is no issue with suggesting another site when the other site has information needed that is not supplied on the current forum, or has features not available, etc. Deleted and moved to a "Topics under review" section are basically the same thing. Both remove the post from the public's eye. Who said anyone was trying to make people leave this site? It's not as though a person can't be members of two forums. And other places can offer things that SSA currently does not. The intent was clear, and the last sentence of my prior post answers your last two sentences quite well. So you say "there is no issue with suggesting another site when the other site has information needed that is not supplied on the current forum, or has features not available, etc." answers "It's not as though a person can't be members of two forums. And other places can offer things that SSA currently does not." So why delete the post? And the intent was not clear that he was telling people to leave here, that was an (incorrect) assumption on your part.

Just wondering, but how many times have you posted on a different forum telling someone to come here? I have posted loads of links directed over here when there is helpful information about to the topic at hand. So it's ok for you to recommend that people come here but not for people to recommend somewhere else? There is a big difference when it is a link that can help answer the question, compared to telling someone to move to another site. By posting that link, you are telling them to go to another site. You could just post the information. Once again, completely different when I am helping answer a question or finding a solution that has already be answered here, compared to just plain telling people to go to another site. In addition, I am not going to copy and paste information that people other then myself have posted, so a link would be posted regardless to cite the source. One is clearly beneficial and supports the topic on the original forum, the other is not. We can keep going in circles on this, but the difference is very clear. While I agree there is a difference, it's not great enough to warrant the deletion of one kind and not the other. Why's it a big deal if someone else recommends another site though? If you were truly confident in the quality of this site, you'd have no worries. Nothing was deleted, only one post was moved to a place where it could be discussed. I have no worries on the quality of the site, that is and has never been in question, what was is the intent of a user to purposely try to make members leave with them. In addition, there is no issue with suggesting another site when the other site has information needed that is not supplied on the current forum, or has features not available, etc. Deleted and moved to a "Topics under review" section are basically the same thing. Both remove the post from the public's eye. Who said anyone was trying to make people leave this site? It's not as though a person can't be members of two forums. And other places can offer things that SSA currently does not.

SWEET!

Just wondering, but how many times have you posted on a different forum telling someone to come here? I have posted loads of links directed over here when there is helpful information about to the topic at hand. So it's ok for you to recommend that people come here but not for people to recommend somewhere else? There is a big difference when it is a link that can help answer the question, compared to telling someone to move to another site. By posting that link, you are telling them to go to another site. You could just post the information. Once again, completely different when I am helping answer a question or finding a solution that has already be answered here, compared to just plain telling people to go to another site. In addition, I am not going to copy and paste information that people other then myself have posted, so a link would be posted regardless to cite the source. One is clearly beneficial and supports the topic on the original forum, the other is not. We can keep going in circles on this, but the difference is very clear. While I agree there is a difference, it's not great enough to warrant the deletion of one kind and not the other. Why's it a big deal if someone else recommends another site though? If you were truly confident in the quality of this site, you'd have no worries.

Just wondering, but how many times have you posted on a different forum telling someone to come here? I have posted loads of links directed over here when there is helpful information about to the topic at hand. So it's ok for you to recommend that people come here but not for people to recommend somewhere else? There is a big difference when it is a link that can help answer the question, compared to telling someone to move to another site. By posting that link, you are telling them to go to another site. You could just post the information.

HAPPY BIRTHDAY!!! :woot:

omghi2u!!1

omghi2u!!1

I doubt he'll be around these parts much anymore.

Just wondering, but how many times have you posted on a different forum telling someone to come here? I have posted loads of links directed over here when there is helpful information about to the topic at hand. So it's ok for you to recommend that people come here but not for people to recommend somewhere else?

Thanks guys.

How about Palmela Anderson, lol Palmela Handerson