FJF
Members-
Content Count
73 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Community Reputation
0 NeutralAbout FJF
-
Rank
Newbie
-
FWIW, I ordered some SDS products and posted my impressions on CA-F: http://caraudio-forum.com/forum/index.php?...wdown-products/
-
PM sent.
-
Fair enough. I'd done.
-
So now you're lying about lying. Is that like a double negative? Your dishonestly was illustrated in no uncertain terms. Just have a look at the other posts. Come to think of it, a liar will lie, so what's the point?
-
If you think that being a proven fibber is a point of pride, then you are. Call me crazy, but liars aren't the folks to trust.
-
As I addressed your comments directly and on-point, quoting your assertions as a reference, this claim is ridiculous and clearly dishonest. Mind you, I'm not uploading proof by assertion. The post in question is located right above. I'm happy to see at least a single grain of intellectual truth. If you say so, but we all know what your claims are worth. I have no idea what you're talking about, though, an "I know you are, but what am I" is hardly something to be proud of.
-
Isn't it obvious? It's because I enjoy it.
-
That's very helpful and educational. You see, the horizontal section of the trunk cage is slightly more than 7.75" above the floor. As I would prefer a downfiring enclosure - mostly due to aesthetics - 3/4" doesn't leave me much room to work with. The drivers are 4.5" deep. As far as audio, I'd much rather go for 3/4" with a double baffle and structural reinforcement, and I will do just that for another project. In this case, the car is the focus; the system is secondary in importance, so I'll most likely opt for 5/8. That'll leave me ~1.5", or just a little more, between the floor and the box. As you mentioned, the ~4lb difference in material isn't enough to lose sleep over. Thank you taking the time to look into this.
-
Welcome to noobdom. Am I writing in a tongue spoken on another planet? If you can't rephrase your comments in a commonly understood manner, your question is answered. BTW, what's stopping you from doing just that? Let me guess; your points are silly at best. Yet, somehow, you feel the need to keep posting, even though this is seemingly a lame attempt to try to get a piece of your own. Ruts-a-ruck. Again with the strawman argument? Clearly, the record says otherwise, so why spin the facts and not act honestly? <SIGH> At the risk of stating the brutally obvious, posting revolves around communication. As you're unwilling to make your comments easily understood, I'm certainly not willing to spend more time than necessary to go though the text. I'll settle for some quotes. As I encountered while posting here, the forum app will allow for quite a few quotes. Once more, you're acting dishonestly purely for the sake of a confrontation. Unfortunately, you aren't doing all that well.
-
That's certainly showing respect for the forum members. :-( As you're too lazy to delineate your comments and actually be understood, you'll have to forgive me for not reading any further. If you'd like to reformat your post, so that one doesn't have to struggle to read it, I'll gladly respond.
-
Interesting. You purposefully spin my question and then begin to argue against your own claim. A strawman at its "best." I asked whether the individual read the whole thread, as his comments did not follow what was already posted. There's a world of difference between that and your disingenuous assertion asking whether one can read. Too, if you can illustrate how I misrepresented a post, please do so. Just saying it is equivalent to blowing smoke. How does he know without listening to the setup in the car, as he as no idea as to the room gain and in-cabin response. Why do I feel like I'm repeating myself? Clearly, you've read my others posts and we still get this gem of an argument. Please illustrate how such a thing is possible. How do you know, seeing that you've just seen a pic of the trunk and have no way of gauging the in-cabin response? Okey-dokey Why paraphrase when the original comment is located just above. To wit: "I haven't used that 8, but every ID sub that I have played with preferred the enclosure on the larger side of their recommendations." 1. As I've posted earlier, I've also played with a variety of ID subs and my opinion differs. Seeing how I have to listen to the system and not him, his point is moot from its inception. 2. Thinking that a totally different driver is similar to those he mentioned is simply ignorant. Given this factor, my point stands. And, a Cocker Spaniel is a dog, not a cat. So what? Could you rephrase that please in a manner that's understood by other humans? This isn't even remotely funny, regardless of the intent. Do I need to salute? I was going to stay out of this, but it's hard to resist. I like to think of myself as a sporting man, but this is like shooting fish in a barrel. Now, do you have any relevant pointers relative to my constraints, in lieu of uploading gibberish? I'm not holding my breath. Are we finished or would you like to go for another round? {edited grammar}
-
Sorry, folks, but I have to go. Work calls and I've spent way too much time playing around. BJ, I will be in touch. All the best and good luck to all!
-
Sorry, I missed your question. It's not a racecar; it's a street - legal racecar that I drive as much as possible. As you mentioned, in a (pure) racecar an audio system is ridiculous. FWIW, my road course machine is just a shell. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Sorry, folks, but I have to go. Work calls and I've spent way too much time playing around. BJ, I will be in touch. All the best and good luck to all!
-
Guys, I'm asking for ideas as to making the box better, given my constraints. I'm not here to fight. If you can't do that, please don't post. My original question has been answered. Unless there's some relevant information to read, there's no reason to stay around. My thanks to BJ and Denim. I apologize if I forgot anyone
-
(somehow I doubt that you're laughing) If you can explain how to model room gain with nothing to go on other than a pic, you may revolutionize audio as we know it. If you can do the same with in-cabin response, the AES would make you an honorary member. Who the fruck make this guy a member of the tech team? This is Audio101. That's equivalent to asking, "When did you stop beating your wife?" Please illustrate your claiming the enclosure is too small. I'd love to see this. Ahhh...so all 8" subs are the same. Brilliant. So what? 1. As was already illustrated, the enclosure is not too small, regardless of your wishful thinking. 2. <sigh> Are you another poster who didn't take the time to read the thread, yet felt compelled to upload his confrontational comments, regardless. I have reasons for using 8" drivers. Whether you think there may be a "better" route is irrelevant to my needs. Do you actually think that someone like me didn't compare sub weights before making the choice? Yes, there are slightly lighter 8" subs - Quatros come to mind immediately - but I'm more comfortable with the IDs. I'm looking for a light enclosure; I really don't need advice as to the drivers. Clearly, your comment was meant to confront and not help. (Errrr...) Thanks anyway. {edited typo}