Impious

Yay. Should sound excellent For the van, I presume?

Go through and delete all 16,000 of your posts so they can't use them for future reference ??

To having more posts than Jmac

Type R Powa!!

Rated 600w x 1 @ 4ohm...but is supposed to be underrated and do closer to 1200w.

Assuming you have the room for the box and sufficient amplifier power; Yes.

Indeed, we're gearin' up for some full-swing action here. Obviously the market for this driver won't be as big as our Premium series, which happens to be much more practical for the average user.. but now I finally have something to throw at those crazy fanatics lookin' to break their ears and use all the juice from their mobile flux capacitor (don't mind the Back to the Future reference ) and the going rate would be? On the website. http://www.soundsplinter.com/rls_supreme_s...er_drivers.html

You took a pic of being pulled over ? captin obvious!! lol That kind of had a hidden meaning. Add "why in the hell did" to the beginning of the sentence

You took a pic of being pulled over ?

Oh My God! queer. So? You enjoy it.

This whole thread makes no sense. I like boobies and like to touch them. Male or female, doesn't matter. Boobies are boobies. I like penis and like to touch them. Men or little boys, doesn't matter. Penis is penis. Michael Jackson is my hero.

I don't get the whole fixation with Ipod's. But maybe that's just me. I'm not really into the whole "tiny little techy things that nobody really needs but everybody really wants" scene much.

This whole thread makes no sense. I like boobies and like to touch them. Male or female, doesn't matter. Boobies are boobies.

:raises hand:

iS tHERE A rEASON yOU'RE tYPING lIKE pOWER tURD ??

That it's kind of like ice cream....pick your flavor. I dunno....there are advantages and disadvantages to each method. I guess it's just finding what you consider the best set of trade-offs.

Only if you bring Texas Hots with you

Oh snap! That's coming up here soon. It's about 3.5hrs away from me. Probably won't go both days as I have no $$ for a hotel (unless someone wants so shack me up for free ), but probably make it over for one of those days. Just to spectate and meet people. I'm sure Kinetik will be there aswell (seeing as how OH is their home state), so I'd imagine Audiolife will be there aswell. Also, I believe the Rl-s will be in the IN/OH area around those dates....someone may get to bring 'er along and show her off I'm supposed to have it sometime early Oct....if I have it in my possession it'll definitely be along for the ride. KC is too far for me.....won't be going to that. Though USAC/IASCA would be the finals I'd prefer to catch as I'm more of an SQ guy myself.

I was just thinking about this the other day. I just may toss 'er in IB.....I'm not entirely sure yet. But if I get the time to set it up I will. Plus IB would work better with my limited power. I don't know....we'll see

<<----- 666 You got me before my edit http://forum.elitecaraudio.com/showthread....05&pagenumber=6 start reading at werewolf's posts. It explains better and has some nifty math involved.

Okay...I think I get it. In short; Since music is recorded at something less than 0db (generally in the vicinity of -6db), by using the standard 0db test tone to set the amplifier gains we end up using much less of the amplifiers available power for a given volume setting. So if we set everything prior to the amplifier for maximum unclipped output with a 0db (simple terms; it will never clip with music) and then *increase* the amplifier gains to compensate for the decreased recording level we have the best mix of unclipped signals and maximum power output from the amplifier for a given volume setting. The amplifier *may* clip with this setting....but due to the short time period of the event, we will hardly ever hear it and the effects won't be damaging to the equipment (i.e. no blown speakers). My interpretation sound right to anyone else?? However, this works contrary to standard SNR theory, where you want the gain in your system as early as possible rather than later since each device in the chain not only adds it's own noise to the system, but also amplifies the noise from the previous components. According to what I've read previously, the method RC and DN recommend would result in the worst SNR, I believe, since all of the system gain is in the power amplifier. Here is a quote: http://forum.elitecaraudio.com/showthread....05&pagenumber=7

Well, I haven't read the links yet. But, going by your post Nick, he's basically saying that due to the dynamics in music you want a more powerful amp with a lower gain setting (-10db rather than 0db, resulting in less output from the amp compared to it's maximum available output) so that the amp won't clip when it encounters these very dynamic transients ?? Close?? But that doesn't seem right....because then wouldn't the preamp equipment still be clipping since they aren't set using the -10db test tone? Oh well...off to read those other links before I get totally confused..... Wait....now I feel like an idiot. If you used a -10db setting, the amp gain would be higher, not lower. So now my entire post doesn't makes sense....... *goes to read links*

Yeah...I don't understand the 3:1 ratio myself. Would be nice if you (I...someone in general) could find more info on the rational behind it. Dave Navone is a trustworthy source, I'd generally listen to what he has to say.....but this one doesn't make sense in my simpleton mind.

Nope