Duran

Scott, that is the answer I was looking for, thank you very much. I also second the composite cone option

YESSIR better order though, this will change soon with the price of sundown going up. Is Jake raising prices or are you? LOL, YOU KNOW IT ISN'T US. Actually Mark, I was hoping it was No offense.

YESSIR better order though, this will change soon with the price of sundown going up. Is Jake raising prices or are you?

X2!

You know Salmon Arm isn't too far from Idaho, I'm temped to take a drive now

Good man, pretty girl by the way.

I understand, I already checked out your pics, and you know what...NO AUDIO!!!!! Get movin!

Thank you, and I also agree with you for the SUV.

Lol thanks for the add on myspace

I understand what you are saying, theoretically it might work like that. But I would like a technical explination of why. I'll leave that one for Scott or Nick to speak of, as I relegate myself to hang back and watch Thats why I addressed it to Nick

Steve is a good man, and has done great things in the fields of car and home audio. Teamed up with AA I have full confidence in him. Steve is a member on here also.

The SSD is slightly superior in my opinion. It is more SPL geared than the 9500. With more motor force, and more efficiency. A loaded SSD would not totally obliterate the 9500, but be slightly superior. Comparing the 9500 and BTL is apples and oranges. The BTL is in its own class. If you're comparing the SSDs to the 9500s, and you're saying that the SSDs are slightly superior. Then how is the comparison of the 9500 to the BTL the same as apples and oranges? Are you saying that the 9500s are sound quality subs while the BTLs are spl subs? Yes, the BTL is in its own brute SPL class. While the 9500 is a high powered SQ driver that prefers sealed enclosures.

So it this a new woofer? Or will you just be adding a 22" capability to the whole line?

I understand what you are saying, theoretically it might work like that. But I would like a technical explination of why.

To my knowledge all Fi motors are the same size, 10"-18".

Nick, Will the motor be changed for the 22"? It looks too small. Also, are there any advantages to larger drivers besides cone area. Lets say, that with a 10" driver you have a certain amount of bl, and when you put the same size motor on a 22" basket and have 300 sq. in. more cone area wouldn't there be increased mechanical stress, less excursion capabilities, and much more air resistance?

OH MY GOD!!!!!!!

22" basket? Prove it!

Please watch the abbreviations CA-f is nothing like CA.com. Oops, thank you very much bromo. Edited.

Welcome to SSA. I'm sorry they are so childish, but it makes me glad I found SSA before CA. I attempted to look at some threads over there, but I was unimpressed by their ignorance.

I hate to say it, but you would be better off with 1 18". I am a firm believer in this theory:

Lol you better make a build log.

With that amount of airspace, considering you can even fit them in there, they would sound phenomenal.

You have a very intelligent description of what you are, and what you are for. I use Freewebs for my audio website also.

^^^