hobbydepot101

they have the morel mt22 on e-bay might be a better deal, again these are great tweets http://cgi.ebay.com/Morel-MT22-high-end-tw...1QQcmdZViewItem

I have tried many tweeters, even focal tn52, i also do not like harsh tweets, i went with morel mt23, very nice, a real natural sound, warm, but crisp, not harsh http://www.woofersetc.com/index.cfm?fuseac...Product_ID=4838

Thanks for your response, i will have to think more about it

yes i have to keep them or else my wife would know what i'm up to

I would like to go with two jl audio 13 tw5 or two re audio sl12 http://www.audiojunkies.com/blog/646/res-n...nclosed-woofers http://mobile.jlaudio.com/products_subs_pa...php?page_id=245

One question, are we speaking mid/bass or a true midrange? because what they offered you in a 2" midrange would be for a three way system.

thats sounds good seeing that the 9" thats in the door can handle 200watts Continuous and a 1000 max. we will see what happens http://www.woofersetc.com/index.cfm?fuseac...Product_ID=4780

thanks i will start buying the extra stuff i need, one more question i am going to buy another of the same amp, which is a arc audio cxlr 4150 now that will give me a total of 8ch i need only 6ch should i bridge that amp into 2ch/ and if so put that 328watts per channel where? i want to make full use of both amps

http://www.woofersetc.com/index.cfm?fuseac...Product_ID=4523 http://www.woofersetc.com/index.cfm?fuseac...Product_ID=1282 here are the two sets of xovers that i am working with. i will give them up and try electronic crossovers, so at lease i will be able to compare for myself

you know what, i will give it a try, if i sell the crossovers that i have which cost me $600 for the two pair that should be enough to get a decent electronic xover, but i do wonder why all components, and even home audio comes with passive, and why are passive xovers so expensive if no one are buying them?. but you r right the 9255 is design to use e/xovers. thanks and i will let you know the end result.

Your answer sounds logical, true electronic xovers will give me more flexibility, but believe it or not the system sounds very nice, but can be better i know, now the question that i have is if i use e/xovers on a three way system, i would need a amp out to each componet right/ so i would need 6 channels?

http://www.criticalmassaudio.com/catalog/i...amp;productId=3 http://www.audiojunkies.com/blog/646/res-n...nclosed-woofers http://mobile.jlaudio.com/products_subs_pa...php?page_id=245 http://www.illusionaudio.com/docs/carbon_subs.htm

what is so hard about slopes that the manufacture give to you? woofer 20- 2600hz mid 450-7000 highs 1400- 2500, and a lot of room to play with. so i do not see the e=mc2 problem. but maybe its that you are not familiar with these crossovers and morel, and dzr9255 or arc audio cxlr its not rocket science

my mids and high are great! not a problem there, and the cdt crossovers are more flexible and sound 5times better then the morel xovers, i chose to go passive because all of the electronic xovers that i have looked at did not have better numbers as far s/n and thd then the amp and the drz9255 that i am using, and we all know that your system is only going to produce the highest amount of hd that is link in the systems path. but these are my ears and i have to do what sounds good to me, even though i have had great feedback from some experts in my aera.

thanks for that info, thats what i wanted to hear, i plan on using two re audio shallow mount or jl audio's new one, or critical mass, or illusion audio nd12i can you help me narrow that down to one