dem beats

You didn't ask me but I love redwing boots. You pay for them, but my last pair lasted 10 years of really hard but occasional use, and one year of a labor job in horrible conditions. And they fit so good... so comfy

What be dat papa peng?

996 was a 1999.

GTS is sexy as fuck.

That was my other option when I bought my car. Problem is they haven't depreciated a 1$ since Dec 2010. Stupid I didn't buy one. Now the new ones fetch way too much dough to be on the drawing board when my lease is up in Dec .....this kind of surprises me. When I first started looking into vehicles, I liked the cayenne. But they took Porche from the #1-2 spot for reliable, to one of the worst. All due to chilli pepper issues.What surprises me is your post. When I was shopping they were still number 1. I see some not so positive news now though.It was my #1 go to pick until I read all the problems. Same with the one 996 I fell in love with. Just about the only year to have a problem....

Torn intestine in three places including a really good rip. Alive and kicking, sore as hell, and still in Thief River Falls with his girlfriend. Stupid fluke of a fall too. Maybe going 10 mph and the snow just fell out from underneath the machine, he tried to ride it out and it rolled him into a street sign. Sled missed the sign, his stomach caught it and bent it the fuck over. Ouch!

Everyone ok from your trip? ER trips are never good.

"Don't over cook them" Jackass.

That was my other option when I bought my car. Problem is they haven't depreciated a 1$ since Dec 2010. Stupid I didn't buy one. Now the new ones fetch way too much dough to be on the drawing board when my lease is up in Dec .....this kind of surprises me. When I first started looking into vehicles, I liked the cayenne. But they took Porche from the #1-2 spot for reliable, to one of the worst. All due to chilli pepper issues.

Speaking of da beetus, my A1C is down. But new med is on order. Hope this one doesn't make me so tired.

Truth!

That's excellent for the diabetes I am sure. It's the foundation of a diabetics diet. My blood sugar is so fucked up. I can eat salad or sugar and fat by the bucket, and my sugar is always ok 2 hours later. My morning fasting blood sugar is always high though.

It's most beneficial to athletes who participate in endurance events. Endurance events also go against how we naturally work. Funny how that works. Hey, now you are getting it. If there is some short term goal then it might pay off. But by no strech would I call most LONG distance runners healthy. And they don't eat the same leading up to an event as they do the rest of the year...... and they do rely on carb fuels while running

I know how Stefan feels about butter.I love butter. I could eat 2 sticks fo aho.

That gif melts my butter. And y'all know how I feel about butter.

Speaking of shrimp, where is Sean. I suck at cooking shrimp so I purchased a few pounds. Need recipes and technique tips.

Shay lauren (sp) She is putting her pants on... mmmmmmmmm From my phone or I would link it.

I can do all this + healthy. Fuck yeah, youthAge is a bitch.

She elivates my heart rate for sure!

Or just stare at that gif girl for a few hours. Mmmmmm

Besides who cares ab out being healthy when I can watch harlem shake videos and eat shrimp chips. Or ice creme. Mmmm love me some ice creme.

Lord knows I am not doing anything to make myself healthier other than working out in a disorganized manner. Getting married really fucks with your plans and routines, that is for sure.

Pretty common method.If you support that method, don't you (in theory) support the conclusion that fasting provides benefits to a person in training. Running in the morning is just fasted training on a bit smaller scale then IF. If you ate at 6 at night then ran the next morning at 6 before you ate you would be at a 12 hour fast, which is just shy of the IF 16 hour "standard".Actually it would be quite less given all bodily functions slow while sleeping including digestion.True. I used to ead a fat and protein shake or meal before bet. Slows digestion further and keeps my tank with something in it all night.

It just isn't logical. No one thinks "well, I have to push my body to the limit. I should do that on an empty tank and durring the least limber part of my daily cycle." Look at farm culture even. Slow low energy chores are done before breakfast, then soon after waking food is eaten, usually in big portions too, then hard fucking work comes next. The IF theory is against how we naturally work. Again. If will still show huge benefits for a lot of people because if you just follow a couple rules you can see results and it takes the thinking out of eating. It has a lot to do with the reward mechanism in our brains. How we get this little bump of good feelings when we accomplish a goal. For most people not eating is just plain easier than eating healthy. Then when you eat durring a truncated time table you definitely make it worth your time and make bbetter choices. The fact is, if IF works for you, use it. Getting healthier is always a good thing. So if you can by using an IF method. Then rock on. I just get pissed when I read websites saying it is the bees knees and how we really should live, when almost every bit of evidence we have says no. Of course all thosd coaches and professional athletes could be wrong, but untill you have tried that lifestyle comoared to the IF method you won't know. And eating scheduled ballanced meals is hard as hell for most people. It becomes simple when you are used to it, but it's certainly a shit load tougher than just not eating.

Pretty common method.If you support that method, don't you (in theory) support the conclusion that fasting provides benefits to a person in training. Running in the morning is just fasted training on a bit smaller scale then IF. If you ate at 6 at night then ran the next morning at 6 before you ate you would be at a 12 hour fast, which is just shy of the IF 16 hour "standard". That is correct. I don't support it in general. But it is common. Interesting facts are comming to light about slowly walking. If you don't much elivate your heart or lungs you might stay in a fat burning zone. However, more practical and proven data says that it is a non issue. Having a shake or meal before the exercize wouldn't make it less effective. For some moving around after they eat is tough though, so a morning snack is out of the question before they run. If straining yourself on an empty tank was so amazing no one would buy those power gel snacks and Gatorade would never have worked. They fact is that those calories DO increase output and performance. Unless you have a verry accute goal and must focus on that, it doesn't make sense.