dem beats

Bag solely depends on what you want to carry. More like brief case. Hold papers and maybe the laptop. I would seriously lay out everything you think you'd ever want to carry and then find a bag with a pocket for each and everything. Same advice I'd give for luggage shopping, being disorganized sucks.Smart! I just did that with a cleaning bag for the stores. I hate messy stores so I made a cleaning kit. Don't know why I didn't think of that for my daily shit.

50mm of course but what about a cheaper lens than the high end canon prime, You don't need and really won't see the benefits from the high end so why get it first when you can drop so much less money to get your goal.http://www.amazon.com/Canon-50mm-1-8-Camera-Lens/dp/B00007E7JU I am waffling on the 1/4 or 1/2.right now I have have so many shots wrecked because of lower light. So I could benefit from either. If you do start pixel peeping, the 1/2 and 1/4 are really close. The build quality of the 1/8 is really bad, and is extremely hard to use. The focus ring is a bitch. I may not have such a hard time with using the 1/4. But I got to use the 1/2 and even not knowing too much about photography it is built better. Other solution is get a better body and bump that ISO up to combat the low light. LoL at new body. The only serious upgrade would be a full frame like the 5Diii unless the new 7D is a huge improvement.At least for low light. You will gain more steps going to a 7D than going from 3.5 to 2.8....hmmmmmm, that really goes against what happened when we tested them.

Sean's is probably faster and he can do it in flip flops. LoL

Gotta love my commute. I am not even dressed and I will.be at work in 15 min.

That is wrong.Give a man a fish and he eats dinner. Teach a man to fish and he sits in a boat and drinks beer all day. When we gonna go angling?

Most Tamron and Sigma lenses aren't something you want IMO. I've made that mistake once. They do have sweet spots though. The Tokina 11-16 is a helluva wide. Like it better than the Canon equivalent.I really wish they made a 70-200 2.8 in a cropped sensor format so it was sized like the 4.0. I'd buy one in a heartbeat. The 2.8 is way too fucking big and a waste on a crop. I loved using it! You call it a waste due to size and extra zoom?

You are going to hate me. The biggest problem you have is the T4i, not the glass for low light. Other option is a tripod.50mm 1.4 is a bargain, I have one if you want to shoot it. Problem is that it is too long. A 40mm would be way better. Well, the t4i did better than any other non full frame including the 7D at the time I tested them. Using the same glass for dark shooting it handled itself better. I also need the movie function. Moving up to a 5D is not something I can afford, even if I sold my rig. The fastest my lens can be is 3.5, and that isn't that quick at all. Anything other that at 18 the f goes up and up to 5. That is dark compared to 2.8. I am not sure but I would also guess the larger higher priced lenses have better glass and let more light in. Higher ISO without noise would be great but I can't afford that and a lens to shoot with.

I want duck so bad. It sounds so yummy. Think I will swing by the asain market and get me one tomorrow. Duck stop off Dale?Shuang hur

I have a lunch bag and a camera bag, and I don't really want those together. I also will want to bring my laptop and I will need to hold papers in it. Not the least of which can be deposits.

Bag solely depends on what you want to carry.More like brief case. Hold papers and maybe the laptop.

The 100-300 is a joke, 70-200 WAY better.I bought an 11-16 Tokina and it is NICE The 70-200 is now on my radar. Been price shopping since. I don't know why I typed 100-300. I haven't even used one. I was typing incorectly.

Calculators don't always follow PEMDAS. Sometimes we need to add more parenthesis to make it clear to the machine.

it's good

I love hey blue shoes!

I am not concerned with the 1/8 not being enough for 99.999999% of everything I want to do and more. It is a REALLY cheep feeling lens. Like uber cheep. And Fucking loud. That makes a difference for video. I liken it to the cheep off brand set of pliars compared to a solid made snap on or similar tool. I have all the faith in the world it will do the job when it works, I just have low faith in it working for long.

50mm of course but what about a cheaper lens than the high end canon prime, You don't need and really won't see the benefits from the high end so why get it first when you can drop so much less money to get your goal.http://www.amazon.com/Canon-50mm-1-8-Camera-Lens/dp/B00007E7JU I am waffling on the 1/4 or 1/2.right now I have have so many shots wrecked because of lower light. So I could benefit from either. If you do start pixel peeping, the 1/2 and 1/4 are really close. The build quality of the 1/8 is really bad, and is extremely hard to use. The focus ring is a bitch. I may not have such a hard time with using the 1/4. But I got to use the 1/2 and even not knowing too much about photography it is built better. Other solution is get a better body and bump that ISO up to combat the low light. The canon doesn't have an auto ISO feature?Of course, but the highest Fstop of 3.5 in low lowlight is not cutting it. Even worse when zoomed. Slow zoomed glass ruined some wedding shots. Hence why I will spend the $$$ on the best zoom. Maybe I will just pick up the 1/8...

50mm of course but what about a cheaper lens than the high end canon prime, You don't need and really won't see the benefits from the high end so why get it first when you can drop so much less money to get your goal. http://www.amazon.com/Canon-50mm-1-8-Camera-Lens/dp/B00007E7JU I am waffling on the 1/4 or 1/2.right now I have have so many shots wrecked because of lower light. So I could benefit from either. If you do start pixel peeping, the 1/2 and 1/4 are really close. The build quality of the 1/8 is really bad, and is extremely hard to use. The focus ring is a bitch. I may not have such a hard time with using the 1/4. But I got to use the 1/2 and even not knowing too much about photography it is built better. Other solution is get a better body and bump that ISO up to combat the low light. LoL at new body. The only serious upgrade would be a full frame like the 5Diii unless the new 7D is a huge improvement. At least for low light.

Yes. Unless the budget doesn't allow. I could get 15 f/1.8s for one of the 1.2's

for my A55 I have a 50m and I love it Honestly use it more than my zoom... I would look into Tamron they make some great budget lenses.. My next lens will probably be a 18-200 from sony. Here is a picture from my 50mm sony.. it was about 160$ That is a great shot!

I may rent a sigma and the Canon and see if the Sigma is that bad in daily use. I over do almost everything.

50mm of course but what about a cheaper lens than the high end canon prime, You don't need and really won't see the benefits from the high end so why get it first when you can drop so much less money to get your goal. http://www.amazon.com/Canon-50mm-1-8-Camera-Lens/dp/B00007E7JU I am waffling on the 1/4 or 1/2. right now I have have so many shots wrecked because of lower light. So I could benefit from either. If you do start pixel peeping, the 1/2 and 1/4 are really close. The build quality of the 1/8 is really bad, and is extremely hard to use. The focus ring is a bitch. I may not have such a hard time with using the 1/4. But I got to use the 1/2 and even not knowing too much about photography it is built better.

I have been shopping and I need/want 2 new lenses. The goal is to get much faster set up. My current is an 18-135 f/3.5-6. I have a LOT of problems with dim light. It is also a huge pain getting good depth of field in many situations. I also need something with more zoom. My T4i is of course a crop sensor so what ever the mm is, it becomes 1.6 times that for zoom. As of right now I am thinking a fast 50mm prime just as it is the gold standard and the ever versatile 70-200mm. From canon these are about 4000 or so for the top of the pops. That is a shit load of money. Any lower cost suggestions? Maybe just buy the 50mm prime and save for the 70-200 and rent it if I ever need it?

I want duck so bad. It sounds so yummy. Think I will swing by the asain market and get me one tomorrow.

Wow.If someone came and to sell you a subwoofer and just took your money and walked out, then what?I think it is completely absurd, I wouldn't want to kill someone over any physical item... However lets say it was a man and you tackled him chasing him down. When he landed he went temple first into a curb. You didn't try to kill that dude. Technically the crime was theft, prostitution doesn't even to come into play dice he never got fucked. Legally this is a just ruling. It doesn't really feel good, and is maybe not so "ethical" however. You're changing the situation.I wouldn't shoot someone because they "stole" $150.00 from me. He could have easily gotten his money back without shooting her. Meh. You don't know. She may have been on PCP and super powered. I wouldn't get physical over $150 period. I may have changed the circumstances, but the situation is the same. Goods or services were paid for, but not delivered. The person who lost their money reacted within the measure of the law. A horrible accident happened and the other person died. Same situation. Just different circumstances.

Wow. If someone came and to sell you a subwoofer and just took your money and walked out, then what? I think it is completely absurd, I wouldn't want to kill someone over any physical item... However lets say it was a man and you tackled him chasing him down. When he landed he went temple first into a curb. You didn't try to kill that dude. Technically the crime was theft, prostitution doesn't even to come into play dice he never got fucked. Legally this is a just ruling. It doesn't really feel good, and is maybe not so "ethical" however.