-
Content Count
1,114 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
10
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Gallery
Everything posted by garychurch84
-
Port location,Opinions needed
garychurch84 replied to garychurch84's topic in SPL & SQ / Fabrication
Thx Q -
Port location,Opinions needed
garychurch84 replied to garychurch84's topic in SPL & SQ / Fabrication
I keep reading about ratios like 2:1 for example for every cube sealed use 2 cubes on the ported side. Last topic I seen about a 4th order guy came in sayin he wanted to do a 4th for a sundown use useing X ratio,poor guy got throwed under the bus lol. 4th order seems to be a touchy subject here lol so I'm treading lightly -
Port location,Opinions needed
garychurch84 replied to garychurch84's topic in SPL & SQ / Fabrication
awesome:) -
Port location,Opinions needed
garychurch84 replied to garychurch84's topic in SPL & SQ / Fabrication
that calculator is pretty damn close to doing it by hand. Remember Winisd doesn't model bandpasses correctly. It seems to make the gain on the low side. I calculated about 10 by hand using the Loudspeaker cookbook and the car stereo calculator was extremely close on all of them Maybe I don't understand how this works just yet lol,I'll take that back I know I don't.Vr and Vf seemed like a lot of cubes for the icons or is that not what this ? -
Port location,Opinions needed
garychurch84 replied to garychurch84's topic in SPL & SQ / Fabrication
I found this calculator during my research looks to be BS.What do you all think? http://www.carstereo.com/help/Articles.cfm?id=27 -
Port location,Opinions needed
garychurch84 replied to garychurch84's topic in SPL & SQ / Fabrication
I wouldn't mind trying it,I know jack squat about box design tho.I'll search a little to see what I can find. -
Port location,Opinions needed
garychurch84 replied to garychurch84's topic in SPL & SQ / Fabrication
I think it was a 4th order like mentioned earlier,I think there was pic give me a sec -
Port location,Opinions needed
garychurch84 replied to garychurch84's topic in SPL & SQ / Fabrication
This what I started out talking about.Would benefit any from firing my port thru here? -
Port location,Opinions needed
garychurch84 replied to garychurch84's topic in SPL & SQ / Fabrication
that's not a bad idea -
Port location,Opinions needed
garychurch84 replied to garychurch84's topic in SPL & SQ / Fabrication
If you are planning a comp "Burp" or 30 sec SPL enclosure I'd suggest tuning WAY higher than 44 htz ...tbh I think I just wanna be a bit louder than my current setup I may only compete a few times a year.I want to get a good bit of exp before I get that deep in -
Port location,Opinions needed
garychurch84 replied to garychurch84's topic in SPL & SQ / Fabrication
The demensions I posted in the in the first quote is the absolute biggest that can go in my car,anything bigger will have to be built in the trunk. I'm wanting to to tune around cabin gain which is 40ish I don't know the exact sweet spot.while I was searching google I found one guy on SMD said. His 98 gtp peak at 44hz I know the Icons aren't really spl but I feel there's more numbers to be had.this box will only be used when I decide to compete -
Port location,Opinions needed
garychurch84 replied to garychurch84's topic in SPL & SQ / Fabrication
I know that stuff is sticky as hell -
Port location,Opinions needed
garychurch84 replied to garychurch84's topic in SPL & SQ / Fabrication
I've also been thinking about this box being more for numbers if that changes anything -
Port location,Opinions needed
garychurch84 replied to garychurch84's topic in SPL & SQ / Fabrication
lol,hmmm didn't think to try it in the rear deck -
Port location,Opinions needed
garychurch84 replied to garychurch84's topic in SPL & SQ / Fabrication
deadening? No sir,not yetJust"Great Stuff" in the trunk lid -
Port location,Opinions needed
garychurch84 replied to garychurch84's topic in SPL & SQ / Fabrication
So stay with what I have -
Port location,Opinions needed
garychurch84 replied to garychurch84's topic in SPL & SQ / Fabrication
I just don't wanna spend $200+ on a box and it not benefit me any.As for the rear deck I'm already about rip that noisy sob out lol. -
Port location,Opinions needed
garychurch84 replied to garychurch84's topic in SPL & SQ / Fabrication
which ever would work best,I was gonna have subs facing back seats an port firing thru armrest -
This may be a stupid thread or question or both.I was curious if. anyone out there has designed a square vc sub?Would there be any pros and cons if it was/could be done?Sorry if this is waste,I woke up with this random thought for some odd reason lol. That N is soppose to be a ? mark.in the title
-
I don't see anything good by using a square voice coil. Round is the best way to go!I can agree with this,say a 2' round coil wouldn't have as much area as the 2' square coil.but I dunno lol. This was a random thought I woke up with yesterday figured some of the tech guys would have a little input on it http://www.goto-denshi.com/product-square-wire-melit.html square wire is better. Subwoofers with flat wire are already being produced, he is asking about square coils.thank you.lolIts all good this is a dead subject if it could be done/or be better it would happened by now
-
I don't see anything good by using a square voice coil. Round is the best way to go! I can agree with this,say a 2' round coil wouldn't have as much area as the 2' square coil.but I dunno lol. This was a random thought I woke up with yesterday figured some of the tech guys would have a little input on it
-
Lol,I asked if it cab be done if so what would be the pros/cons of such a coil?not if anyone has ecer seem them lol.stay om point!haha
-
Pics of the engines I work on and with...
garychurch84 replied to altoncustomtech's topic in Photography
I only read the first page!Would love to have job doing something like that.awesome! -
Not yet,I'll order more wire when I order my alternator etc.in a few weeks until then taking it easy.
-
Didn't record long.don't like doin that,wanted to show people can't just throw an amp THIS SIZE OR LARGER on stock electrical.