cmarion1024

In the WinISD graph it shows the front and rear chambers as 1.8ft^3 each, was this modeled for two subwoofers or one occupying that enclosure? I ask as if that was for one since would take up double the space available. I am at work and have no access to it right now.

Sure if you dont mind on the specs.

Down to 25Hz should be good. So the 29Hz dimensions would be good (15.5 x 2.75 x 24L). Would it be better to make a backwards capital L for the port or start at the lower rear wall and go towards the front, then back towards the rear to get the full length?

That much I understand. After Duane mentioned "boominess", I didnt want it to sound like complete crap after building another box. Some think the "crap" bass sounds good, can't say I am a fan. But I wont know until I build it. I will pick up the materials this weekend. I just want to confirm and reconfirm the port measurements. Was this a Kenwood? After it began I googled this situation and found a plethora of people with the same issue, but no one said they found a cure. Im thinking it is either caused by my door speakers, or power drop to the unit. I am getting a four channel amp to power my doors, but hell I thought this would atleast be able to run them kinda okay. I didnt expect it to be phenominal for the Polk Momo components, just work until I get the amp next week. I will try the wiring first. If it dont fix it then we will see with the external amp.

Im currently running 1700 watts at 1 ohm to both. How much bigger do you recommend? I listen to a variety of music such as rock, heavy metal, rap, dubstep, and techno. Im currently having issues with my head unit, so I cant test music non stop. My stupid Kenwood kdc-mp745u keeps shutting down even with the internal amp switched off after a minute or so of music no matter the volume. I have to pull the unit out, pull the rear fuse and put back in to restart. Amazing how the majority seem to start failing right outside of the one year warranty. Bastards. Never again will I get a Kenwood, this is ridiculous.

I ask since I "read" the best of both worlds is in the 33-35Hz range for a ported enclosure compared to sealed to have a clean frequency band. However, looking at the graph it appears it is not so here. The 29Hz looks very clean and an even flow. On the 29Hz box, the port comes out to 42.63 in². Is that okay if it is recommended to be between 25-40" of port area per sub? Again, I am assuming that is per sub since it does not say.

Here is the graph using the box and port dimension's you just posted for 29Hz and 34Hz vs my sealed. Does that look right compared to yours? 34Hz starts off lower. Looking at the graph, in your opinion, would it be worth it ""SQL"" wise to go ported? It will be louder, but is it going to ruin the sound quality? This I dont know by looking at a graph, I am not a pro.

I deleted the WinISD I dowloaded and used the link you provided for v7. This one doesnt crash. I entered in all the specs I could find on the Lethal Injection and the speaker dimensions. After designing a sealed enclosure to match what I built vs IA Specs sealed vs IA sweet spot ported, here is the graph. The ported I seem to be stuck at getting a port to correctly match the Hz and port area. The dark blue is my box volume, light blue is IA spec volume. Green is ported, at least the best I could do.

I can make it 17x17x41. That is as big as I can go. Unless I make a capital T, the base width cant be bigger than 41 due to the wheel wells. 17" deep is my max to still fit the double stroller, if need be. And 17" high is at the top of the seat. On SSA for the specs, they are not all there either. I read a thread about people emailing the company over the specs. Why not give them all then? Not that difficult, at least I dont think it is. ABrokeNinja; I am doing that now to see what it comes up with. I guess it doesnt like the size I wanted to use?! I see many enclosures that use one big port. However, when do you figure in the air movement speed? As in is a 10" wide by 4" high port that is 12.8" long be big enough for these two subwoofers? Or would it be better to use two ports that give me the needed port area, length and tune?

Yes, the Lethal Injection 12 (x2) 4ohm DVC. Depending on the port, I am looking at an overall net volume of 3.8cuft. Which is ok, the dimensions give me .2 cuft extra to take in account for the port to drop down where I need it. Just a hair under. I downloaded WinISD originally, but it kept crashing. It may not like my Win764. Also, IA doesn't list all the specifications that WinISD asks for and it fills in the blanks with its own calculations. Then it gives an error when you try to load that subwoofer because the parameters don't match up. I got irritated with it because I couldn't even load my subwoofer. Not its fault, just missing specs. I see why people do pay to have an enclosure made, but I don't want to pay for a sweet design and box if I end up not liking it. It may be a pain to learn, but I enjoy learning new things and the pleasure of building something yourself. Any assistance would be awesome and grateful. I am not asking for someone to do all the work, just point me in the right direction or show me where I am making the mistake. I'm confident in the wood work and matching the dimensions it says to do. I just can't get the port to tune to 34Hz (anywhere from 32-34Hz would be great) and the port area to match IA's specs. The sweet spot seems to be 34Hz, 2.0cuft and 30in2 port area per sub.

Here is what I am working with to give you a visual. Maybe this will help in figuring out the best way to do 60" of port area and be at 34Hz. I can also flip it to where the top/bottom is 17" and the front/back is 13.5". My max from front to back outside is 17". And my width is maxed at 41" to sit on the floor for outside measurement. Can I do two ports at the rear? My problem is getting my Hz to match the port area.

error

Ahh! The spec's sheet just says : Lethal Injection Series 12 Sealed .8 cubes - 1.4 cubes Ported 1.75 cubes - 2.5 cubes, 25 - 40 Inches of Port, 28-35 Hz Average: 2.00 cubes, 30 inches, 28-35 Hz So, I too would assume per sub. There for I need to make two ports with these dimensions. Thanks, that never crossed my mind. For a first time attempt, figuring the correct math is difficult. It seems easier and more feasable to make one large port, which then would need to be 60 inches of area to accomodate two subwoofers. What I cannot seem to get right is a port length the will fit in this box for my available dimensions. I must not be looking at my situation correctly, I have a feeling I am missing something in the design area that would accomodate what port I need in this box for one large port. I am about to just give up on trying this. I can read till my head explodes, but I am just not grasping what I can and can't do for this to work.

Thank you very much! That I understand. So if the "average" according to IA is 2.0cuft per 12 and 30" of port 'area', I would want to do a width of 10" and height of 3", giving a length of 12.13 and an area of 30" for 34Hz. Is that a better combination since it minimizes my port length, but stays within the specified port 'area'? Help section in the program you suggested: #7 - Port length uses the box wall or baffle(s) as part of the port length. So a port that is 10" long with one baffle using .75" wood will only need to be 9.25" long as the box wall or baffle(s) will account for the other .75". If using two baffles, then it would be 8.5" long as the baffle will account for 1.5" of port length. So by using the numbers above from 12-voltDOTcom, it actually raises the Hz to 35 in this program. If I make the width 9", height 3" gives a length of 10.697" and area of 27" which brings the tune to 34Hz. I also entered into the box for number of wall baffles to two, since the top and rear wall would be part of the port. It shows physical port length as 6.95", does this mean I still need to have the port near the top of the rear wall and 90* down which means the part of the port going down is 6.95"? Now in that link I read it said it automatically figures in the correct port end math. There for I should be good if I make my port using these dimensions I entered into the calculator. Right? Forgive me, as I am trying to understand everything that I have read for the last three days and apply it the first time. I am hoping that if I build this, it will not sound horrible and waste my time. I liked the idea of the round ports with the flared ends, but it seems to be a debate or personal interest on which is better. As it only requires the hole in the box and the tube (plus ends) for the given calculated length versus constructing a slot inside the box. However, it seems to be a personal preference and different sound for each application. Before I begin, I will wait for a response from you or someone else that these numbers are correct.

Or would I be better off using a round port inside the box to save the space? As in a 4" Precision Port with flared ends or a 6"? The calculator advises 4.478289" of port length using one 4" port, and 12.27065" of port length for a 6".