KyleBrown

Ok, that's what I was more or less looking for on the SSF setting. I assume it uses the type of filter, but I have no idea how to tell the difference lol. Where does the .707 come from? Just curious so I can educate myself. Thank you for your input. I've had it for some time. I previously had a pocket o-scope which was very inconsistent and died in about two weeks. It works fine for what it is. -3dB change = half power. If you have 100watts from 10v*10a, then a -3db change would be 100watts / 2, so 50watts. In order to drop from 100watts to 50watts from a change in both voltage & current, you end up with 0.707 0.707*10v = 7.07v 0.707*10a = 7.07a 7.07amps*7.07volts = 49.9849watts. thanks man

So on this next run I plan on running my amps not strapped. I know how to gain set with a DMM. Xovers I typically do by ear. My plan of attack is to DD-1 both amps, check output voltage of both amps and match to the one with less output. Now I'm not worried about setting the LPF on the amps since I can do that via the HU. My only area of concern is the SSF. I'm a little fuzzy on gain matching with the SSF. Do you play your selected tone of choice (lets use 30hz in this example) continue to turn the filter up until you see a dip in output voltage? Then repeat on the second amp. I'll most likely use Y-splitters for the RCAs to ensure proper distribution of pre out voltage instead of the output on the amps. Eventually I'll use some sort of Bass eq to bring the voltage back up.

Ok, that's what I was more or less looking for on the SSF setting. I assume it uses the type of filter, but I have no idea how to tell the difference lol. Where does the .707 come from? Just curious so I can educate myself. Thank you for your input. I've had it for some time. I previously had a pocket o-scope which was very inconsistent and died in about two weeks. It works fine for what it is.

Is he a little "slow" nice stuff

that's badass man

Looks nasty man!

build the box to form to the shape of the trunk

why so low?

anything?

Nice fab job man

I sold it to alan

why isn't there a bikini?

You're still applying it!!?? oven test and a two other things. Still too elastic though.

Well, the further I've gotten away from the start of the roll, the better it works. Still not up to my standards. The adhesive is still very gummy. It seems to be holding its own weight, but it seems it might fail over a longer period of time. Being mounted upside down that is.

clean that ish up foo!

I find you sig too distracting..... my final words for this thread

we've been emailing back and forth. He's being extremely apologetic and respectful. So I'll hold off adding this to other forums. still offered me further discounts.

This is very true. also very true

Also, to add to this shit storm. My email has been going crazy with spam and people are trying to hack my photobucket password.

I'm pretty sure Audiofanaticz or whatever his name is on S.M.D. deleted my thread. He got extremely defensive and tried to make me out to be a liar. Only posting certain pictures from my photobucket in which no deadener was visible on the bottom of the rear deck. Those pics where taken shortly after I blew up my diamonds, pulled everything out of the trunk including the deadener on the bottom of the deck. Its extremely time consuming, but its part of my madness. I told SS jon partially about my stress tests between damp pro and roadkill expert. I never divulged any full details as they were for my one satisfaction. No homo. This was also the reason why I did not post anything about the wire. On top of everything I was offered team pricing on all AT gear so I was trying to be respectful and meeting him in person. So I had no motivation to post negative results about AT deadener other than to be honest. Other people posted in that about the AT being sub par and were quickly shut down. All this being said, he did send an email saying he would refund double my money if I returned the product and it tested faulty. Funny thing is, I never received this email. He did post a screen shot showing it was sent, but I did not get it. If I would have gotten this email, I would have agreed to it most likely. Even though there's no way to prove he would be honest about his findings. I then posted screen shots of my phone in the emails, and he made a smartass remark about they can be deleted. After I apologized for there being a break down in communication which was not my fault. I would have agreed to sending it back for testing if he didn't make a smart ass remark. I will do more testing with the product. Its entirely possible that the small portion I used was faulty, as there is one small piece still sticking. As for the "air" pockets, it looks like that from the deadener pulling off the metal. On top of all this. I've dynamat extreme on my trunk lid for over 4yrs. I've yet have any deadener fail like this. Sorry for everything being so mixed up, but its a lot to try and cover. By no means am I saying all AT deadener is junk. Maybe I just got unlucky