ssh

Make sure you clean the smudges off when you return it.

Tucson has enough sloots to keep new content all the time? J It's not targeted toward Tucson. It grabs images off other blogs and tumblr accounts (avoiding copyright issues), posts to my site, then submits the images and my site url to other sites for traffic. They see the tits on tumblr, reddit, stumbleupon, sex.com, etc and they click the image/link back to my site. From there I get earnings off ads.Rather genious. Respect that idea man. J The extra money is cool, but if I can actually make enough to pay for classes than I'll literally die laughing my ass off at the idea.

Best part is once each site is setup, I don't have to do anything.

Tucson has enough sloots to keep new content all the time? J It's not targeted toward Tucson. It grabs images off other blogs and tumblr accounts (avoiding copyright issues), posts to my site, then submits the images and my site url to other sites for traffic. They see the tits on tumblr, reddit, stumbleupon, sex.com, etc and they click the image/link back to my site. From there I get earnings off ads.

You finish your shoot, rip it on disc and throw away the files. Not a big deal.I shot 1500 or so pics in Europe. No trouble with storage. That would fill my father's office up with over 2500 dvds rofl. He isn't a hack.Ironically my uncle in LA is a graphic designer in the movie industry and has a wall of backed up jobs on dvds--actually looks kinda cool when space isn't an issue.

If it works this is going to be awesome and fucking hilarious.

<- Going to try to pay for rest of college off porn websites. Setup one site and after a month it made 60 bucks, so now I'm making the entire process automated so I can scale it.

I should probably shower too--before class.

Six hours later, done with chem lab reports.

You finish your shoot, rip it on disc and throw away the files. Not a big deal.I shot 1500 or so pics in Europe. No trouble with storage. That would fill my father's office up with over 2500 dvds rofl.

That's some nice craftsmenship.

Sweet, how's it feel?

Yeah we have about 4TB of photos + another 4TB in backups, so we swap harddrives every year.

You can batch process RAW files. My wedding photog shoots in .jpg for the fact file size is smaller but she has to make sure to get the exposure right the first time since there is no saving it later. Yeah my father does the same, 1000+ weddings and no issues.

Okay raw does give you a lot more flexibility on the computer than either jpg or tiff, so for a small number of shots I would use it, but for a wedding with tons of pictures it still seems like a pain in the ass to deal with and not worth it unless you plan on working on every single picture.

Get Lightroom. 900 times more useful for us. Nothing to learn, just really easy and helps so much. Your machine shoots in RAW right?I have heard aperture is a good one too, but I tend to trust Adobe. There's really no point in using raw for anything any of us do. Perhaps for a single landscape shot, or the alike, but otherwise tiff would suffice.Tiff? It is jpeg or RAW. Only options. As for no reason, I completely disagree. You and I don't have kids either, but if you have a shot that is over or under exposed, fixing a RAW file is easy peasy. Jpegs not so much. That's a bit odd about only having jpg or raw. Raw maintains all the information from the picture where as jpeg throws some out in compression IIRC, so yeah you can do more adjustment with the raw before the picture starts looking like shit, but the tradeoff vs time/speed and converting everything back to jpg for the end person doesn't always seem worth it to me. I could see if someone took a bunch of pictures and had the exposure way off to begin with that raw would be awesome cause then they could fix it to a better extent in the computer. I'm curious have you ever used up the buffer on your camera from taking too many shots closely timed together with raw, and had to wait? I know that use to be an issue with shooting raw since the files were big and the write speeds couldn't keep up, but I don't know how the newer cameras are. I guess that's my two biggest reasons for not using raw: write speed vs camera buffer (which matters for weddings, events, etc, but for the landscape photographer or taking pictures over vacation it doesn't come into play), and having to convert all the pictures afterwards into a traditional format. But since your camera doesn't shoot in tiff then I could see using raw instead, if write speed isn't an issue.

Get Lightroom. 900 times more useful for us. Nothing to learn, just really easy and helps so much. Your machine shoots in RAW right? I have heard aperture is a good one too, but I tend to trust Adobe. There's really no point in using raw for anything any of us do. Perhaps for a single landscape shot, or the alike, but otherwise tiff would suffice.

Fuck that's beautiful. The valley reminds me a little bit of El Capitan off the 101 in CA--which I want to go backpacking through sometime!

While in high school, I would grab a camera every chance I got and snap pictures of my junk. It's a nice funny surprise. I should have borrowed a few teachers' cell phones for that. Cell phones didn't have cameras when I was in HS. I figured, but they had the game snake?

A/C is fixed, no more 95degrees.

While in high school, I would grab a camera every chance I got and snap pictures of my junk. It's a nice funny surprise. I should have borrowed a few teachers' cell phones for that.

"I'm like pro at getting rid of the camera flash in the mirror, and I digitally remove any turds in the background."

I wonder if anyone has labeled themselves as a professional "selfie" photographer, rofl.

Hope you get proper bokeh so you don't spoil the subject with a busy background. I threw it into the street one time, and snapped shots as people swerved to miss the anaconda.

Other than those, the rest of my shots are of my dick.