Jump to content

Leaderboard


Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation on 08/03/2011 in all areas

  1. 2 points
    While its a tremendously great driver, I'd be worried it isn't geared toward your goals. It will pretty much be on the complete opposite end of the spectrum from your HCCA.
  2. 1 point
    SLP SPL anybody? Well im not going to say too much about it but i purchased a 00 SS camaro today. build log to come as things start being purchased. Car is loaded with goodies LS6 intake with cold air 3" cowl hood most of the suspension already upgraded flowmaster exhaust long tube headers yada yada yada. Car has a kazillion miles and the paint on the back bumper is chipped/peeling I go pick it up on thursday. ill have more pics then.
  3. 1 point
    This little build here is for a co-worker. He bought the old Hifonics equipment out of the van from me and plans on giving this truck to his son to drive in about a year or less. The system was designed on a fairly short budget, though he didn't want to cut many corners there's still almost $1,000 in it. Equipment consists of a Hifonics ZXi 6006 amp for the components, a Hifonics BXi2006D sub amp, a pair of 12" Hifonics Zeus subs, CDT COM-626 6.5" 2 way components and a JVC KD-HDR60 head unit. He purchased a "custom" enclosure from ebay for an easy fit under the rear seat. It's a sealed enclosure totaling 2.2cuft. net volume (according to the manufacturer) and he raised the rear seat himself ~3" and mounted the amps to the top of the enclosure. Before you ask, yes he understands the heat problem associated with doing this and will have the bottom of the seat raised when playing the system hard or when the temperatures require it. It has KNU 1/0 and 4 gauge CCA wire ran for the amps so there's room for future upgrades, the subs will be wired to 2 ohms on the 2006D and I'll be wiring the BIG 3 as well. While it's not a real bad-ass system or flashy by any means, it should be a great beginning setup for his son. Forgive me on the number of pics for this build. It's been VERY hot and humid here (heat indexes >110F) everyday and so I've been trying to make the most out of the time I spend working on it and unfortunately not as worried about getting the pictures. Here's a picture of the door panels off. I removed the factory mesh cover's and the factory tweeter plates from the door panels, removed the factory tweeter and cut holes for the CDT tweeters to mount into the plates. Here's a shot of the box he bought with the amps mounted to it and one of the subs resting there on the center hump. I also added poly-fill to the enclosure. Here's a general shot of the passenger side of the truck. You can see the RCA's coming out of the bottom of the dash, and the CDT woofer mounted there as well. Here's a shot of the driver's door with the CDT woofer mounted in it. I just have the wires looped up there to keep them out of the way. Quick shot of the JVC mounted in the dash. Here's a shot of the back of the cab stripped down for wire running purposes. Not much left to do here. Here's a shot of the finished doors. As you can see I kept as factory an appearance as possible there. All that's left is to finish placing the wires where I want them to run, get things hooked up, install the wires for the BIG 3 and tune it.
  4. 1 point
    From everything I've seen, the N1 will be attached to the pure sound quality roots the Q is based on, and has since veered from.
  5. 1 point
    Instead of using jb weld see if you can find an isomethacrylate adhesive. Some when applied to metal cures so hard it can not be scrapped off. It must be cut off with a metal lathe.
  6. 1 point
  7. 1 point
    Alright, got everything installed, hooked up and done last night. He and his son came to pick it up and were very happy with it. His son was very surprised with how clean it sounded. Apparently he has a cousin who's into car audio who's ride "sounds like a public pool full of fat girls farting in the water", those were his words verbatim, LOL!! So, they're happy it turned out pretty clean and the overall sound was enough to make them more than happy with it. My co-worker said his son spent around 2.5hrs playing with and listening to it last night after they got it home. As before, the pics are pretty limited, but they tell the tale so here we go. Can you believe the factory wire tracks had enough room in them to fit a run of Knukonceptz 1/0 AND 4 gauge CCA wire? Here's a couple of pictures of the wires getting routed to their intended locations. Got the rear driver's side trim panel and the back seat back in the truck. Here's a couple of shots with everything wired up and ready to rumble. Overall it didn't turn out too bad to me. The subs are horribly choked by the box configuration though and that really seemed to mess with some of the response and output but I don't believe anyone with less building, tuning and listening experience would ever notice without a side by side comparison. The CDT components were decent as well and showed the limitations I expected for their intended price point. First was the tweeters which were quite bright, almost to the point of annoyance on some songs. Even with some fine EQ tweaking they seemed had a tendency to want to shriek on some music. The other thing I noticed was the mid-bass's inability to handle almost any bass frequencies at all. CDT shows in their specs a power handling of 150wrms WITH a crossover point of 100hz. I have to say it seems as though the power handling drops off significantly with the crossover anywhere below 100hz which was a little disappointing. Luckily in the sealed enclosure the subs were up to the task of stretching that high with little localization to them, which was plenty good enough for the boy's first setup. Overall it should make him plenty happy until his craving for more bass starts to take over, at which time I believe we'll probably be removing the back seat all together and doing another build with different subs and components and a ported enclosure.
  8. 1 point
    Nice man. Now all you need is some screw down wire ties to secure the blue power/speaker wires going to the 1500D
  9. 1 point
    That looks good, cleaned it up a bit. Can't tell the width of that new panel, but that 100.4 would look sic mounted on it below the 1500!
  10. 1 point
    If you want a good vented cheap 8" driver look here. Damn near identical to the TB. http://www.mcmelectronics.com/product/55-2421&t=1
  11. 1 point
    For the sake of keeping it cheap, I say go ported. I did a Tang Band 8", the WP-740 I think, ported, 1.5cuft with a 4" aero tuned to 28Hz. It turned out pretty bada$$. I used a 150 watt plate amp. I'm sure the REx 8 is pretty similar to the Tang Band. I'm not sure about the PR setup. The seem to drop off pretty quick below tuning, at least that's what I've seen when modeling one in WinISD. With that being said, I think it would be uber bada$$ to use this as a PR: My link I don't know if it'll work worth a damn, but it would be a hoot to hear some good bass and see one of these wanging.
  12. 1 point
    This. Although I don't know about the SA's but the Skars sounded like butt to me, no where near what my ICON sounds like. Haven't heard any skars, SAs sounded good to me, but the icons I had were just on another level (sq). Would the SSD's have comparable SQ? The SSD's sound great, but ive never heard an icon to compare. I haven't heard any ssds but I think they would be more comparable to the icons in the sq realm.
  13. 1 point
    First of all you really shouldn't be using youtube in any way to aid in your decision. It will only mislead you. I agree with Stefan as well. The SA series and the VVX weren't designed with sound quality in mind. You might hear that they sound fine to some, but that is subjective. They are a little peaky compared to an Icon or even an SSD. That is actually desirable if you have SPL in mind and they're certainly not overly peaky. I'm not trying to put those drivers down whatsoever, just saying they are more SPL oriented. For what you want I'd wait for either the Icon to come back or get an SSD.
  14. 1 point
    This. Although I don't know about the SA's but the Skars sounded like butt to me, no where near what my ICON sounds like.
  15. 1 point
    I don't believe the sa12s or skars are up to par with ssa icons as far as SQ goes.
  16. 1 point
    There are some designs here that will work great. http://www.soundsolutionsaudio.com/index.php/downloads.html
  17. 1 point
    Ssa icon would be damn good. Sq is superb and still pack a punch.
  18. 1 point
    Who's happy? He can't read, take it easy on him. Its funny though that Fi is still a cheaper route, money-wise, even with the US parts, higher quality parts, compared to other companies that outsource.
  19. 1 point
  20. 1 point
    did some extreme work today! Serves a double purpose, seals the 6x8 hole and serves as a mount for the Huge ass x-over
  21. 1 point
    Back on topic, I got some pics of the carnage, went to Harbor Freight and got my favorite tool by far.. and it only cost me 3 bucks. a good bit is shredded.. ^--- favorite tool... and no not my penis Left it for some Hobo to find, I know I'm a good person
  22. 1 point
  23. 1 point
    sure things BOSS.... o yeah and welcome to ssa. why dont you log in..... before you make demands,
  24. -1 points
    sure things BOSS.... o yeah and welcome to ssa. why dont you log in..... before you make demands, welll............demands im just asking persons who own bls to give their opinion..its a request.
  25. -1 points
    Nice double post! Better to keep this between you and Tejcurrent and not bring it to a public forum!
×